How is Biden useless? He has the US economy growing at 5%. UK and Europe will be lucky to get 0.5%, they are boomingI can accept that Biden is useless. But I struggle to label him a socialist. And your reasons for backing Trump are no different from those of the Germans who decided Hitler was a good idea
I was being generous to the person to who I replied, accepting on face value that his kids' situation has got worse for reasons attributable to Biden.
Well said and absolutely right.I can accept that Biden is useless. But I struggle to label him a socialist. And your reasons for backing Trump are no different from those of the Germans who decided Hitler was a good idea
Yes, Yes, Yes! Absolutely what he said
There’s no need to introduce conspiracy theories over ‘censorship’ with the link that is not working for European users here - Sometimes the sound of hooves are only horses not zebra.
You reap what you sow…
The reason your kids are suffering is due to the ‘trickle down economics’ put in place by that well known Democratic sorry Republican Ronald Reagan. Who single handily gave the American rich the chance to get richer at the expense of everyone else. To justify the obscene levels of wealth, the super rich claim anything that looks to reduce their wealth and improve the lot of the poor is an act of Socialism…. And you mugs fall for it.
Yep - he'll just get his acolytes to send him some money to pay it, citing the Judge as one of those conspiring against him in this mega witch hunt
It's a weird phenomenon that the Maga fans are so resolutely against the idea of chipping in a fraction of their income to help those less fortunate - base level assistance with Healthcare etc - yet without so much as a seconds thought willingly throw their money at such a wonderful, amazing, successful - the most bigglyestly successful - billionaire evah!1!one! whenever he gets into a scrape.
They don't 'fall for it', inexplicably the reason for allowing it to happen is even worse.
It’s a scam.
You dont appear to know what a conspiracy theory is. Its not a conspiracy theory where hidden behaviour of a malevolent kind takes place its an accusation which can be shown to be right or wrong. In this case wrong.
There’s no need to introduce conspiracy theories over ‘censorship’ with the link that is not working for European users here - Sometimes the sound of hooves are only horses not zebra.
As I said, the OhioNewsExpress website posted above does not comply with EU data protection regulation (which is often resolved simply by tweaking the website tracking permissions) nothing to do with ‘censorship’. That is what the 451 error code is that we see when hitting the link.
The tyranny of GDPR popups and the websites failing to adapt
GDPR has changed the internet for millions of people. But nobody can agree on how to stay on the right side of compliancewww.wired.co.uk
Don’t be silly - The only people who could be traumatised by an investigation into electoral fraud would be those committing an offence or those like President Trump, making false allegations about electoral fraud for political gain but were subsequently proven their allegations were unfounded.
In the UK as well as the States, there is no evidence to suggest the existence of widespread fraud in elections - every allegation gets investigated;
The investigation into voter fraud that you are probably referring to was that carried out by this Tory Government as a prelude to introducing an unpopular voter photo registration ID - the investigation found no evidence that voter fraud was happening on a scale that could impact election results (as was also the case decided by numerous Courts in the US Election when Trump initiated claims in 2020) and most incidences recorded as ‘fraud’ related to campaign literature …in fact it was subsequently acknowledged by the UK Government’s own Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee looking into voter ID registration as part of the Elections Bill inquiry in 2021 that;
“When academics have studied electoral fraud in other established democracies, where it is also claimed to be common, they tend to conclude that it is in fact very rare. Accusations of electoral fraud, however, are often thought to be very common because they can be made by politicians seeking to undermine the legitimacy of the winner or to make the case for more restrictive electoral laws, from which they might gain partisan advantage.[6]”
I think Trump’s actions since the 2020 Election results have proved that to be the case don’t you?
The Committee went on to report that:
- In a vibrant civil society, it is incumbent on the government to endeavour to increase political participation by expanding voters’ rights. The US case rightly highlights that the introduction of voter ID legislation reduced voter participation, and it is suggested that this was disproportionately high among racial and ethnic minority groups.[17] Attempting to impose more barriers to entry will only cause a groundswell of political apathy, and it will serve to disenfranchise those wanting to exercise their suffrage who will now not have the means to do so. This, in conjunction with the upcoming 2023 boundary review, translates into a partisan dilution of democracy. The government should instead look to address the fact that millions of people are left off the electoral register, to review anachronistic campaign laws and to empower the Electoral Commission with investigatory powers comparable to those of the Information Commissioner’s Office to tackle the new battleground of digital campaigning.
"Open to Fraud" is a long way away from "Evidence of Fraud Happening".Thats not what I remember,
Scrap 'on demand' postal voting to curb fraud, says judge
A top judge says postal voting is open to "industrial-scale" fraud - but ministers insist it will not be scrapped.www.bbc.co.uk
Postal voting is open to fraud on an "industrial scale" and is "unviable" in its current form, a top judge has said.
Richard Mawrey QC, who tries cases of electoral fraud, told the BBC that people should not be able to apply for postal votes as a matter of course.
"On demand" postal voting had not boosted turnout or simplified the process for the vulnerable, he said.
But the Electoral Commission said it would not be "proportionate" to end postal voting altogether.
The government also said it had no plans to abolish the current system, saying it had made it easier for many people to vote.
Since 2001, anyone on the electoral roll has been able to apply for a postal ballot.
In January, the Electoral Commission said it was particularly concerned about 16 council areas in England.
In some of those areas, the BBC has heard allegations that political activists are pressuring families into voting for their candidate, or taking ballot papers away to fill them in, which is illegal."
In the last US election of votes cast over 40% were postal. Hmmmmmmmmmm.
"
