Yesterday's game on iplayer

[Bigbelly]

View attachment 38461

Hard to tell, seems in line with the ball from that angle.

Offside without a doubt.

 

[Da Man Clay]

One foot on the line, the defenders are all behind it? I'd say off but hey ho.

He's definitely infront of the defenders. It's whether or not he's infront of the ball that matters.

 

[Kazenga <3]

The ball definitely went forward a little from Spanish Dave as Barnes was basically on the line when he tapped it in. Looks in front of the defenders= off.

Ah. I see the problem... you dont understand the offside rule

I'll leave

 

[seagullondon]

I'll leave

I think you need a lesson in the offside rule at team c/r headquaters.

 

[supaseagull]

Hope this helps!

 

[Acker79]

He's definitely infront of the defenders. It's whether or not he's infront of the ball that matters.

This. The direction the ball is played is irrelevant. A player has to be ahead of the ball to be offside, and it looks to me in that picture that he is behind the ball.

 

[jonny.rainbow]

Is it still part of the law that if a part of the player's body they can legally touch the ball with is in front of the ball or covering defender when the ball is played then they are offside? Just saying because his head looks to be in front of his left foot.

 

[chunky44]

ONSIDE FFS!

 

[GingerBeerMan]

Is it still part of the law that if a part of the player's body they can legally touch the ball with is in front of the ball or covering defender when the ball is played then they are offside? Just saying because his head looks to be in front of his left foot.

His head's behind too, I just drew another line in paint and it was quite a way behind. Can't be bothered to upload another photo though.

 

[Acker79]

Is it still part of the law that if a part of the player's body they can legally touch the ball with is in front of the ball or covering defender when the ball is played then they are offside? Just saying because his head looks to be in front of his left foot.

Yes that is still the law, but I don't agree his head is further forward than his foot, and not ahead of the ball.

 

[Sheebo]

Ah. I see the problem... you dont understand the offside rule

So many people don't get it

 

[Sheebo]

Offside without a doubt.

Nope.

 

[Garage_Doors]

This.



If the player is behind the ball when it's passed it's not offside, even if the pass is forward. Being infront of the defenders doesn't matter in this instance either.

Nice to see you had the decency to explain rather than Papa being down right rude with no explanation, poor form.
@papa_Lazarou
Are you saying because Barnes was behind the ball he can't be offside ?

 

[Sheebo]

Nice to see you had the decency to explain rather than Papa being down right rude with no explanation, poor form.
@papa_Lazarou
Are you saying because Barnes was behind the ball he can't be offside ?

He did say ' but is he ahead of the ball' to be fair..

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Are you saying because Barnes was behind the ball he can't be offside ?

Yes.

 

[Paddy B]

I am genuinely amazed that so many people still do not know the offside rule!

 

[Acker79]

(click/hover over to enlarge, click an enlarged image to open on it's own page where you can enlarge it further)

 

[Bob!]

View attachment 38464View attachment 38465

Hope this helps!

But Barnes is Number 9, was Hoskins Offside then?

;-)

 

[Goldstone Rapper]

View attachment 38464View attachment 38465

Hope this helps!

If (as in the first diagram) the ball is closer to the goal than the last defender when Calderon plays it, surely the offside trap has already been sprung and Barnes is onside?

A good example at 1 minute 45 secs here

Ajax 3 vs Independiente 0 Copa Intercontinental 1972 FUTBOL RETRO TV - YouTube

 

[Bob!]

If (as in the first diagram) the ball is closer to the goal than the last defender when Lopez plays it, surely the offside trap has already been sprung and Barnes is onside?

Offside.
In front of the ball.