Suspend him for misuse of work email or something.
Surely he's looked at some smut on his work smartphone at some point?
Maybe he text malky
Suspend him for misuse of work email or something.
Surely he's looked at some smut on his work smartphone at some point?
I'm assuming from the above that you have info from someone at the club?
As to the first bit, Poyet was unable start his job at Sunderland until legal proceedings were out of the way with BHA. No more or less mysterious than that.
Don't see that as any indication of the strength of either sides case - the club didn't receive ANY compensation either.
Erm, where is the precedent for a club to receive compensation after they sack a manager?! Clubs get compensation for managers when they allow an under-contract manager to leave for another team and agree a compensation package with that team (not the manager). In this instance there was no need to allow Poyet to leave for another team because he no longer worked for us, and as such, he was free to do as he wished.
Suspend him for misuse of work email or something.
Surely he's looked at some smut on his work smartphone at some point?
This wasn't a simple case of a club sacking a manager for poor performance or whatever but claiming that the manager breached his contract by behaving in a manner that amounted to gross misconduct. As such the club were perfectly entitled to demand compliance with the contract in terms of compensation.
Easy to ask for a precedent - I can't think of another case dealt with in the same way as the GP dismissal was.
there are a lot of people on here who know dick all about employment law. equally there are a lot of people who know dick all about how football managers are employed and 'sacked'.
of course the Finn can be 'sacked'. there is a legal way to do it without compensation (a la Poyet) or there is the 'you are relieved of your duties and here is a wedge of cash to shut you up - please sign here' way (nearly every other football manager).
i can only hope that Bloom is waiting for a trigger in the Finn's contract (i.e. in the bottom 3 at xmas) so he can sack him without compo.
A well thought out & completely accurate post......
There are also a lot of people who know 'dick all' about using capital letters after full stops.
Bloom's made it far more difficult for himself to cut his losses with his statement in the Argus on 12th November that 'he expects the Finn to be at the club "for many years to come"'
http://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/11595001.Tony_Bloom__Sami_Hyypia_is_here_to_stay/
Will the chairman risk an embarrassing U-turn that calls his judgement into question? Sincerely hope so, for his own sake as much as anyone's.
how often do we see a manager binned soon after a vote of confidence from the club owner? often enough to joke when it occurs that they're off.
Bloom will not sack Hyypia even if he takes the club down to league one. We can rant amd rave all we want no change is going to happen.
A well thought out & completely accurate post......
Not true though. You only have to suspend if there is something to investigate think 1 win in 16 is a blatant performance issue.
How do you know that. Always amazes me that people speak with such conviction on things. Is it a way of making people think that you are "in the know".Bloom will not sack Hyypia even if he takes the club down to league one. We can rant amd rave all we want no change is going to happen.