Really, their poor financial management/disregard for the rules will force them to sell players.That decision will force them to sell players. Lol
The whistle is final - unless the decision affects Man Utd.I’m sure you understand the rules better than me, but it just doesn’t sit right with me. The whistle should either be final or not. If that means the laws need to change then so be it. I don’t see how it’s fair in one scenario and whistle can be overturned and in another it can’t.
They will hawk Ramsey around all summer againI wonder if the two owners (boring critics of PSR) will orchestrate another crooked property sale to themselves to cheat again?
Yes, yes, it makes no difference to us, but Jesus Christ.
Villa were denied this goal and, potentially, Champions League qualification because the referee blew his whistle before the ball crossed the line, thereby denying VAR the opportunity to review the incident.
No fan of McGinn at all - the snide **** - but eloquent here (for a Scotch)
They will hawk Ramsey around all summer again
It's annoying. See Zaha, Richarlison etc. Absolute tits on the pitch but seem to be great off it.I thought that - he seemed surprisingly eloquent and likeable![]()
TBF loads of their own fans on their forum calling them out as big game bottlersI thought it was their dick of a goalkeeper charging out and getting sent off, and their failing to turn up again in a massive game (like they did against Palace) that cost them today?
Right to have whistled early. Someone might have got injured or something. That’s what the expert pundits were all telling us a couple of weeks ago.
I mean it’s head-injury FC, so fetch me the Windsor Davies meme.
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it was Jordan Pickford and he had the ball on the ground trapped under one hand - I recall it was pointed out that the rules/laws/whatever state that this now counts as being in control of the ball, equal to having it trapped between two hands.I'm sure I remember there was an incident a couple of years or so ago - I seem to remember it coming up on ref watch on SSN. It was stated then that if the GK's hand was touching the ball, he was in control, and so it was a foul to knock it away from him. Has that changed?
(Daft rule, IMHO, by the way - the Villa goal should in all honesty have stood. But hey, what goes round comes round - make sure the goal line technology is switched on, eh?
On this one though, at the precise moment that Rogers toe poked the ball, Bayindir was not touching the ball as he’d ’fumbled’ it. If that was against us and that decision potentially cost us Europe… we’d be going absolutely crazy on here.If it's the one I'm thinking of, it was Jordan Pickford and he had the ball on the ground trapped under one hand - I recall it was pointed out that the rules/laws/whatever state that this now counts as being in control of the ball, equal to having it trapped between two hands.