Mitoma different level
The level slightly below?
Mitoma different level
What a goal it woulda been though!
spot onPrime Vicente (2004) was one of the best players in Europe, was in a Balon D'Or list and had a bid by Real Madrid for mega money rejected by Valencia. He won La Liga and the Uefa Cup in that season and scored in the final. He was a stunning footballer
We definitely mythologise a little over Vicente’s time at the club based on the reputation he came with given the all too brief opportunities he got to showcase his ability on the pitch. For this reason I’d go with Mitoma, especially in light of the fact he’s produced the moments he has vs PL defences.
I say all this as the person who uploaded that (rather grainy) footage 13 years ago
Though I guess technically the question asks prime Vicente vs prime Mitoma, so actually the answer is still Vicente. (Think I just wanted an excuse to make my initial point)
It's a hypothetical debate and a rare thing for NSC. People are making cases for both options and no one has fallen out.........yet.Always find these threads a bit odd as there is no "versus" in my mind. Both are magical players. I adored Vicente at the time, despite only fleeting appearances and fleeting talent shown for us, him and Lua Lua was a lovely combo. Mitoma, like Knocky, another player that gets you off your seat. Mitoma of course has had more game influence and outstanding magical moments for the Albion.
But a prime Vicente would probably be preferred to a prime Mitoma, no doubt.
He wasn’t missing against Ipswich at Portman RdI always think Vicente was a bit of a myth with us because he hit the bar against Derby and we'd been used to watching Gary Dicker and Matt Sparrow in midfield at the time. He only got 2 goals for us in total if memory serves and always went missing away from home. The good moments were all too brief.
Mitoma is levels above in his time with us. We have been lucky to see him for 3 seasons assuming he goes this summer. He's the most skillful player i've ever seen in the stripes.
I didn't see enough of prime Vicente to compare the 2 at peak levels but at BHAFC it's no contest.
That’s complete nonsense about AK he says himself personal issues ruined his PL experience. Outstanding displays against Manure & City suggest if all was well in his personal life he may have found consistency.Vincente played for us at Division 2 level. AK was an example of an outstanding player who couldn't step up. VIcente would have made that step comfortably but wouldn't have been so magical.
He scored 5 goals in total. Definitely lot of myth and romance around him but that is the attractionI always think Vicente was a bit of a myth with us because he hit the bar against Derby and we'd been used to watching Gary Dicker and Matt Sparrow in midfield at the time. He only got 2 goals for us in total if memory serves and always went missing away from home. The good moments were all too brief.
Mitoma all day long
For me I have said Wow on average more times at Mitoma than I did for Vicente
MitomaVs Vicente in the early 2000s?
But the question was "How about a prime Vicente vs a prime Mitoma?"
I know. My statement made a mockery of the Jonny crumplin football genius song!That's a hurtful snub for Kemy Agustien.
He was magical enough to win player of the year in Spain, when Zidane & Figo were playingVincente played for us at Division 2 level. AK was an example of an outstanding player who couldn't step up. VIcente would have made that step comfortably but wouldn't have been so magical.
I think a fair few (like me initially!) are answering the question they wanted to answer rather than what’s actually in the OPVs Vicente in the early 2000s?
But the question was "How about a prime Vicente vs a prime Mitoma?"