looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Of course, your examples that the most well respected broadcast organisation in the world is really a tool of the Trotskyite left have been sourced from peer reviewed academic texts and journals beyond suspicion of any kind of partiality? Or are they from:
1) Migrantwatch,
2) Breitbart,
3) You, &
4) The Israeli Government.
You are, to rational debate, what David Dunn is to the Rabona.
Your losing it arn't you?
It doesn't matter how esteemed an organisation is if faced with examples of bias you either have to refute them or accept there is a case to answer. It really as that simple, not ad hominem attacks on DGs, myself, not baseless claims that Govenors would have sorted out bias if their was. you would need to show here the level of influence at editorial level.
As the BBC rather ironicly values it "Independence" that kind of oversight is going to be minimal to non-existant. But proove me wrong.Debunk my examples of bias, show that DGs etc tried to root out bias but didn't find any.
Its time for you to either shit or get of the pot.
Its not rocket science, well OK it is to you.