Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Cricket] The Ashes- England v Australia- 1st Test, Birmingham, June 16 - 20, 2023

Ashes- 1st Test- The result ?


  • Total voters
    80
  • Poll closed .






keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,715
Quick reminder Ollie Pope is vice captain
I'm not arguing in favour of dropping Pope but Buttler was vice captain for a while and showed no ability to keep, bat in test matches, or offer any leadership
 


Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
4,394
Darlington
Not really. The big schooling today was that in any tight game, you cannot make basic mistakes. Aussies bowled 3 no balls in our first innings, we've bowled 13, missed a regulation stumping and catch. Nothing to do with bravado, that is just performance.
And considering the Australians have to start again tomorrow, it wouldn't be surprising if we still took the lead in the first innings, despite the fact that the Australian batting is miles better than ours on paper.
Australia left about 50 almost completely risk free runs out there today because they were batting too conservatively.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,929
And considering the Australians have to start again tomorrow, it wouldn't be surprising if we still took the lead in the first innings, despite the fact that the Australian batting is miles better than ours on paper.
Australia left about 50 almost completely risk free runs out there today because they were batting too conservatively.
I'd say they knew it was a good pitch, not doing much, with pretty even bounce in general. A pitch you can still score at a fair lick on without taking taking too many risks. That why I was annoyed at the way Bairstow and Ali et al got out. There were so many runs out there without the need for risk.
 


Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
4,394
Darlington
I'd say they knew it was a good pitch, not doing much, with pretty even bounce in general. A pitch you can still score at a fair lick on without taking taking too many risks. That why I was annoyed at the way Bairstow and Ali et al got out. There were so many runs out there without the need for risk.
This is true. But it doesn't alter my view (which was pretty strongly expressed by both the English and Australian commentators in the first half of the day) that the Aussie batters allowed England to get away with a lot of poor or mediocre bowling.
I'm not suggesting running down the pitch at Anderson first thing, I'm talking about hitting full tosses and half volleys for four and putting England under pressure. Whether because of the slow pitch or the chat about each team's approach, Australia didn't score anywhere near as quickly as they could have done.
If they had, they'd be looking at parity on the first innings as a minimum. As it is England still have a chance.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,929
This is true. But it doesn't alter my view (which was pretty strongly expressed by both the English and Australian commentators in the first half of the day) that the Aussie batters allowed England to get away with a lot of poor or mediocre bowling.
I'm not suggesting running down the pitch at Anderson first thing, I'm talking about hitting full tosses and half volleys for four and putting England under pressure. Whether because of the slow pitch or the chat about each team's approach, Australia didn't score anywhere near as quickly as they could have done.
If they had, they'd be looking at parity on the first innings as a minimum. As it is England still have a chance.
Yes, I was placing wrong emphasis on your statement. Australia tend to take their time as opposed to the class of 2001 who were much quicker gatherers.

The run rate in the 2021 series was very low for both sides. They seem to be opposite to us in that respect now

Hopefully tomorrow morning will bring something. I don't fancy England conceding a lead here. But I'm always a bit glass half full. I've had 42 years of it.
 


Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
4,394
Darlington
Yes, I was placing wrong emphasis on your statement. Australia tend to take their time as opposed to the class of 2001 who were much quicker gatherers.

The run rate in the 2021 series was very low for both sides. They seem to be opposite to us in that respect now

Hopefully tomorrow morning will bring something. I don't fancy England conceding a lead here. But I'm always a bit glass half full. I've had 42 years of it.
Interesting to compare this game to the 1st test at Edgbaston in 2001.
England actually scored marginally faster than Australia in the first innings of that match, but both teams were going at near enough 4.5 an over.
We can only compare the first innings, since Australia didn't need a second to win.
Speaking very generally, I think the fast scoring of that Australia team tends to be exaggerated compared to the current England team - they generally scored at about 3 an over and then Gilchrist would come in and smack it about.
Speaking more generally - positivity doesn't have to align with scoring quickly, there's a wonderful paragraph I read in a book by Simon Hughes (I think?) about watching Boycott use his feet against spinners to get right forward or backwards and control where he played the ball.
 


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,929
Interesting to compare this game to the 1st test at Edgbaston in 2001.
England actually scored marginally faster than Australia in the first innings of that match, but both teams were going at near enough 4.5 an over.
We can only compare the first innings, since Australia didn't need a second to win.
Speaking very generally, I think the fast scoring of that Australia team tends to be exaggerated compared to the current England team - they generally scored at about 3 an over and then Gilchrist would come in and smack it about.
Speaking more generally - positivity doesn't have to align with scoring quickly, there's a wonderful paragraph I read in a book by Simon Hughes (I think?) about watching Boycott use his feet against spinners to get right forward or backwards and control where he played the ball.
I remember the Edgbaston Test of 2001 for Caddick's cameo in the first innings. The 1997 Test was the one that stands out. England took a 350+ lead on first innings and the Aussies knocked them off with two wickets down and then collapsed.

It was Glen McGrath's first Test in England and folk were berating him for being knocked around the park. I remember saying that once he works out that you need to pitch the ball a yard up in England he'll be a different animal. He worked it out, alas.
 




Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
4,394
Darlington
I remember the Edgbaston Test of 2001 for Caddick's cameo in the first innings. The 1997 Test was the one that stands out. England took a 350+ lead on first innings and the Aussies knocked them off with two wickets down and then collapsed.

It was Glen McGrath's first Test in England and folk were berating him for being knocked around the park. I remember saying that once he works out that you need to pitch the ball a yard up in England he'll be a different animal. He worked it out, alas.
One match later at Lords wasn't it? :lolol:
I seem to remember him saying relatively recently that a good length in Australia isn't actually much different to in England, because the extra bounce means you want to pitch fuller than you think to draw the batsman forward.
On that subject, it's interesting to look at Smith's dismissals today and at Sussex. On English pitches I'd suggest that starting within your crease and playing back to a straight, good length ball will inevitably lead to you getting out LBW. But in Australia most of those balls will pass comfortably over the stumps so he can get away with it.
I can't remember if he played that way in thr 2019 series, but I think in general England's bowlers have been too quick to abandon the basic principles of trying to hit the top of off when they've bowled to him.
 
Last edited:


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,929
One match later at Lords wasn't it? :lolol:
I seem to remember him saying relatively recently that a good length in Australia isn't actually much different to in England, because the extra bounce means you want to pitch fuller than you think to draw that batsman forward.
On that subject, it's interesting to look at Smith's dismissals today and at Sussex. On English pitches I'd suggest that starting within your crease and playing back to a straight, good length ball will inevitably lead to you getting out LBW. But in Australia most of those balls will pass comfortably over the stumps so he can get away with it.
I can't remember if he played that way in thr 2019 series, but I think in general England's bowlers have been too quick to abandon the basic principles of trying to hit the top of off when they've bowled to him.
The thing I noticed about pitches in Australia was how it suited certain players from certain pastures. The closest we had was The Oval (as was then) when the Brinds were the groundmen. It's no coincidence that Thorpe was the player the Aussies wanted most. As regards touring, Robinson would always be first name on the sheet.

Interestingly, most surfaces over there, outside the top grades, are artificial. A lad I worked with in Sydney could not believe it when I told him I'd rarely played on one. The irony was that I got in touch with the Sydney Cricket Association and explained that I was looking for some friendly Saturday cricket there. I got hooked up with a team in Concord and played on a grass wicket. I think Brett thought I was taking the piss when I told him.
 
Last edited:








Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member
Sky Sports coverage is very good. Pietersen can rub the wrong way but the overall analysis provided but their team is impressive.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
18,299
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Sky Sports coverage is very good. Pietersen can rub the wrong way but the overall analysis provided but their team is impressive.
Pietersen talking about batting is very interesting.

Pietersen talking about anything else is just awful.
 








Muzzman

Pocket Rocket
NSC Patron
Jul 8, 2003
5,286
Here and There
Morning everyone, goes without saying we need a wicket or two early, preferably within the first hour.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here