D
Deleted User X18H
Guest
.............. by August acccording to............... Prescotts Office.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The ARSEGAS page 2 suggests we will have a falmer decision.
ffs
Rangdo
Registered Cider Drinker
So just short of a year since the enquiry 
pasty
A different kind of pasty
pasty said:
"The plans for the Falmer stadium have been approved by the city council, but opposition from some local people and environmental groups led to a public inquiry, which lasted for several months last year. "
SOME local people....BASTARDS, damn those NIMBY'S to HELL!
Gritt23
New member
hove born&bred said:
... but that timing just makes no sense at all. 'by August' is sometime in July to me, but surely parliament is in recess by the middle of July, and doesn't return until, oh I don't know, but it's certainly not August.
The moment parliament takes summer recess, two jags and all the other politicians bog off on holiday until September at least, there is no way a decision will be made by his office during that time.
It's only MHO, but I reckon that we need a decision before they break up for the summer or we can forget it until October.
Mustela Furo
Advantage Player
- Jul 7, 2003
- 1,481
Labour PArty Conference, Brighton, Last week of September
Maximum Political Capital out of a Yes vote would be for Prescott to announce it in the first or second week of September, then swan off down to Brighton in his two jags to receive the plaudits.
Naturally the converse applies. If a NO decision then it won't be announced until October, after the conference has taken place, so that PRescott can avoid the eggs.
Maximum Political Capital out of a Yes vote would be for Prescott to announce it in the first or second week of September, then swan off down to Brighton in his two jags to receive the plaudits.
Naturally the converse applies. If a NO decision then it won't be announced until October, after the conference has taken place, so that PRescott can avoid the eggs.
lost in london
Well-known member
It will be perfect timing for the start of a new season, loads of good press, and the labour conference, loads of good press. It has to be a Yes!
D
Deleted User X18H
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
Re: Re: The ARSEGAS page 2 suggests we will have a falmer decision.
The article says decisions can be made during recess and I read it again and it does say BY AUGUST however it goes on to say any decision could br subject to a judicial review and a judge could ask Prescotts office to reconsider...... now can the Nimbys afford to do this or for that matter can the Albion (if necessary)Gritt23 said:... but that timing just makes no sense at all. 'by August' is sometime in July to me, but surely parliament is in recess by the middle of July, and doesn't return until, oh I don't know, but it's certainly not August.
The moment parliament takes summer recess, two jags and all the other politicians bog off on holiday until September at least, there is no way a decision will be made by his office during that time.
It's only MHO, but I reckon that we need a decision before they break up for the summer or we can forget it until October.
aftershavedave
Well-known member
Robert Lester Zamora said:
my thoughts exactly....excellent PR with delighted brightonians welcoming our man with open arms...
Lord Bracknell
On fire
Re: Re: The ARSEGAS page 2 suggests we will have a falmer decision.
In August 2003, the ODPM managed to announce decisions in the case of 80 different planning applications. That is seven more decisions than were announced in June 2003.
Parliament doesn't come into it. All that Parliament does is pass laws and scrutinise the work of ministers and government departments.
Not true.Gritt23 said:... but that timing just makes no sense at all. 'by August' is sometime in July to me, but surely parliament is in recess by the middle of July, and doesn't return until, oh I don't know, but it's certainly not August.
The moment parliament takes summer recess, two jags and all the other politicians bog off on holiday until September at least, there is no way a decision will be made by his office during that time.
It's only MHO, but I reckon that we need a decision before they break up for the summer or we can forget it until October.
In August 2003, the ODPM managed to announce decisions in the case of 80 different planning applications. That is seven more decisions than were announced in June 2003.
Parliament doesn't come into it. All that Parliament does is pass laws and scrutinise the work of ministers and government departments.
Last edited:
kevinsmith
New member
pasty said:
End of the summer was Tuesday on the South Coast now overcast and threatening rain.
So tell us now Mr P.
Ex-Staffs Gull
New member
It's a pity it is sooooooo easy to get a change of use of land for say .... a football ground to retail park and sell an institution down the river than it is to get permission to build an brand new, environmentally friendly community stadium on a BROWN FIELD (IMHO) site...
BRIGHT ON Q
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 9,421
Bloody right,mines an ostrich egg.:rescott:CrabtreeBHA said:
dougdeep
New member
Buy your eggs this week!
No fresh ones please.
No fresh ones please.
I noticed a wonderful sentence in that BBC report!!!!
'A seven-day extension was made to the original deadline of 11 June because of conflicting planning reports'
That says to me that the Falmer inspector put in an entirely different report to the damning Charles Hoile report.
Or am I reading too much into it?
'A seven-day extension was made to the original deadline of 11 June because of conflicting planning reports'
That says to me that the Falmer inspector put in an entirely different report to the damning Charles Hoile report.
Or am I reading too much into it?
Lush
Mods' Pet
Oooooh I hope you're right.
Mr Colyer seemed a decent chap to me.....
Mr Colyer seemed a decent chap to me.....