The ARSEGAS page 2 suggests we will have a falmer decision.

[Lord Bracknell]

I noticed a wonderful sentence in that BBC report!!!!

'A seven-day extension was made to the original deadline of 11 June because of conflicting planning reports'

That says to me that the Falmer inspector put in an entirely different report to the damning Charles Hoile report.

Or am I reading too much into it?

I think you are. The material that was sent out for comment (originally by 11 June, with a subsequent extension of time until last Friday) did consist of "conflicting planning reports". On the one hand were reports prepared by the Club and its supporters; on the other were reports produced by the opponents.

I hesitate to suggest that the reason for the extension was because the Club wanted Martin Perry back from honeymoon before the deadline for comments.