Elder for England
New member
- Jan 30, 2008
- 2,388
Listening to the phone-in last night, people were saying "everyone else around us are sacking their managers, why aren't we?"
Why is the fact we stick with the manager not seen as a positive thing?
I for one am proud that instead of booting our manager out with the hope it will turn our season around, we have remained with Adams (by we, I mean as a club) to give him the chance to rectify. Why is it seen that having a new manager will fix things and mean we'd end up in a better position?
I used to think Brighton was different to other clubs, the board, manager, players and fans were united, and even through the not so good times people didn't turn on the other, but it seems we're just like the rest of them.
And before people say they have the right to moan and want the manager out after the time he's been given, the 'Adams out' started as soon as September. I think at the very least, a manager should be given a season.
Why is the fact we stick with the manager not seen as a positive thing?
I for one am proud that instead of booting our manager out with the hope it will turn our season around, we have remained with Adams (by we, I mean as a club) to give him the chance to rectify. Why is it seen that having a new manager will fix things and mean we'd end up in a better position?
I used to think Brighton was different to other clubs, the board, manager, players and fans were united, and even through the not so good times people didn't turn on the other, but it seems we're just like the rest of them.
And before people say they have the right to moan and want the manager out after the time he's been given, the 'Adams out' started as soon as September. I think at the very least, a manager should be given a season.