Shocking Match report on Leeds Mad website

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Buzzer

Languidly Clinical
Oct 1, 2006
26,121
...and will it be deemed as friendly banter if we were to write a reciprocal report called:

Brighton v Paki Town?


f***'s sake. Grrrrr.......
 






Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
21,115
Playing snooker
...and will it be deemed as friendly banter if we were to write a reciprocal report called:

Brighton v Paki Town?


f***'s sake. Grrrrr.......

I bet you're SO angry you've dropped your hair straighters, eh Buzzer? :ohmy:
 


Bry Nylon

Test your smoke alarm
Helpful Moderator
Jul 21, 2003
21,115
Playing snooker
...and will it be deemed as friendly banter if we were to write a reciprocal report called:

Brighton v Paki Town?


f***'s sake. Grrrrr.......

I bet you're SO angry you've dropped your hair straighters, eh Buzzer? :ohmy:
 








Cian

Well-known member
Jul 16, 2003
14,262
Dublin, Ireland
Reported to the domain contact, who's likely to be a techy in the parent company who may or may not care.

Footy Mad is based in Leeds, as it goes. So that could even have been one of their direct staff members - although I'd hope for their own sakes that all the sites are done by external editors like Rivals and SportNetwork are.
 


itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
It's not legal online either (although I can't go into details due to Official Secrets Act)

Erm, anyone can look at details of any legal case as they're public proceedings. I seriously doubt that being homophobic on a website comes under the jurisdiction of the official secrets act.
 




Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
Erm, anyone can look at details of any legal case as they're public proceedings. I seriously doubt that being homophobic on a website comes under the jurisdiction of the official secrets act.

You don't understand and I am not going to explain any further.
Libel and harassment are just as valid on the internet as in a newspaper or other forms of public access.
 


itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
You don't understand and I am not going to explain any further.
Libel and harassment are just as valid on the internet as in a newspaper or other forms of public access.

Yes, that's true. What I take issue with is where you have to bring the official secrets act into it. Still, as you say I probably 'don't understand' because not all of us mere mortals can hope to reach the intellectual and moral heights of you :thumbsup:
 


Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
I am bound by the official secrets act in my work.
 




itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
I am bound by the official secrets act in my work.

Yes, so you keep saying. And I don't expect you to break that, because it would be rather stupid of you.

But court cases are NOT covered by the OSA, anyone can look at them or even go to them. So that's why I don't understand the two points of your argument.
 








Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
Yes, so you keep saying. And I don't expect you to break that, because it would be rather stupid of you.

But court cases are NOT covered by the OSA, anyone can look at them or even go to them. So that's why I don't understand the two points of your argument.

Not all court cases.
 


Robot Chicken

Seriously?
Jul 5, 2003
13,154
Chicken World
You don't understand and I am not going to explain any further.
Libel and harassment are just as valid on the internet as in a newspaper or other forms of public access.

What could be done about a website that harrasses and has printed lies about someone, when the website owner and admininstrators refuse to act?
 












Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top