Would you have to .............................. KILL US?![]()
...and will it be deemed as friendly banter if we were to write a reciprocal report called:
Brighton v Paki Town?
f***'s sake. Grrrrr.......
...and will it be deemed as friendly banter if we were to write a reciprocal report called:
Brighton v Paki Town?
f***'s sake. Grrrrr.......
I bet you're SO angry you've dropped your hair straighters, eh Buzzer?![]()
It's not legal online either (although I can't go into details due to Official Secrets Act)
Erm, anyone can look at details of any legal case as they're public proceedings. I seriously doubt that being homophobic on a website comes under the jurisdiction of the official secrets act.
You don't understand and I am not going to explain any further.
Libel and harassment are just as valid on the internet as in a newspaper or other forms of public access.
I am bound by the official secrets act in my work.
I am bound by the official secrets act in my work.
Yes, so you keep saying. And I don't expect you to break that, because it would be rather stupid of you.
But court cases are NOT covered by the OSA, anyone can look at them or even go to them. So that's why I don't understand the two points of your argument.
You don't understand and I am not going to explain any further.
Libel and harassment are just as valid on the internet as in a newspaper or other forms of public access.
Not all court cases.
What could be done about a website that harrasses and has printed lies about someone, when the website owner and admininstrators refuse to act?
What could be done about a website that harrasses and has printed lies about someone, when the website owner and admininstrators refuse to act?
Oh do be quiet. Let it go and concentrate on trying to grow up and get a life.