[Albion] Premier League 26-28/12/23

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



















Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,887
West west west Sussex
It is fun, and affirming, watching teams who can't play out from the back, attempting to do so.
 








Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,887
West west west Sussex
Isak is a horrible cheat. Var was supposed to help desk with that. It hasn't, so what's your point?
No VAR wasn't.
VAR was supposed to intervene on clear and obvious errors.

Forest played made a stupid challenge.
The horsepuncher used that to his advantage.

The ref gives the right decision as he saw it.
VAR doesn't have enough to overturn.

This decision isn't a referee problem.
Neither is it a VAR problem.

This is all about ALL players falling to the floor under minimal contact.
 










Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,824
Eastbourne
No VAR wasn't.
VAR was supposed to intervene on clear and obvious errors.

Forest played made a stupid challenge.
The horsepuncher used that to his advantage.

The ref gives the right decision as he saw it.
VAR doesn't have enough to overturn.

This decision isn't a referee problem.
Neither is it a VAR problem.

This is all about ALL players falling to the floor under minimal contact.
The Forest player made a stupid challenge? Lol. Don't agree there. I couldn't care less that var isn't supposed to intervene. If we are to be saddled with this apalling system, then at least improve it so we don't have these poor decisions where a player has cheated. Why bother looking at this incident if they aren't prepared to overrule the ref? It's pathetic.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
18,746
Hurst Green
No VAR wasn't.
VAR was supposed to intervene on clear and obvious errors.
It was an obvious error, the contact was debatable if he was even touched.

Forest played made a stupid challenge.
The horsepuncher used that to his advantage.
He cheated

The ref gives the right decision as he saw it.
VAR doesn't have enough to overturn.
Obvious error for all to see

This decision isn't a referee problem.
Neither is it a VAR problem.
VAR is supposed to bring to the attention of the ref an obvious error this most certainly was. Decision reversed and player booked for cheating.

This is all about ALL players falling to the floor under minimal contact.
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,887
West west west Sussex
The Forest player made a stupid challenge? Lol. Don't agree there. I couldn't care less that var isn't supposed to intervene. If we are to be saddled with this apalling system, then at least improve it so we don't have these poor decisions where a player has cheated. Why bother looking at this incident if they aren't prepared to overrule the ref? It's pathetic.
He was behind him right on his heels 'nibbling' at him.

They can't overrule it just because we all hate the team.

Anyway we can now watch it over and over again in super slo-mo.
A process which will provide no conclusion and only validate whatever opinion was originally held.
 




Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,824
Eastbourne
He was behind him right on his heels 'nibbling' at him.

They can't overrule it just because we all hate the team.

Anyway we can now watch it over and over again in super slo-mo.
A process which will provide no conclusion and only validate whatever opinion was originally held.
This is all true. But what is var adding to the situation. Nothing. Scrap it and at least then we can get back to slagging the ref off when he gives it inevitably, but sidestep all the rubbish that goes with it.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top