- Jul 10, 2003
- 29,166
cough. I was there. Cough.
(I wasn't. I was down the resources centre watching Johnny and the Shit Outs and The Chefs. I think. Long time ago.)![]()
There was more quality at the crypt

cough. I was there. Cough.
(I wasn't. I was down the resources centre watching Johnny and the Shit Outs and The Chefs. I think. Long time ago.)![]()
To be fair though, Charlie Harper was already middle aged when the UK Subs decided to cash in on the tail end of punk. Bloke's probably due a telegram from Queen,assuming he's still alive and not constantly touring villages in Switzerland with his kids and grand kids.
Would you consider The Stranglers to be punk?
If so, it's worth considering Jet Black is only two and a bit years off being 80.
Jet Black rarely plays these days, last see him around 2 years ago when he came on for one song at the end.
Don't think they ever classed themselves as punks, but came through at the same time and always had a punk audience.
They had a Dutch Biker following in 77. Had a definite presence when they played at the Top Rank (that's in Brighton, in case you're unaware). Part of the reason they were liked by the punks was simply that theirs was one of the firsl LPs released that was vaguely of the genre, sandwiched between the first Damned and first Clash LPs.I played it almost continuously while 'revising' for my first year exams, 38 years ago.
apparently the Stranglers have recently won the punk world cup on twitter?
beat the Clash in the final
don't know what to make of that really
most hardcore Stranglers fans have a siege mentality,no fanfare required
the Pistols were the ultimate 'punk' band
You're (rightly) the font of all knowledge on The Stranglers but would you consider them as punk? Growing up with them at the time, I did as Rattus had plenty of stuff you could pogo to (Grip, London Lady etc) but, as I got older, I wondered if they just got lucky with the timing of it all.
Would Hazel O'Connor or A Flock of Seagulls be regarded as of a punk variation?
that's a fair point,3 or 4 years either side and maybe it wouldn't have happened for them
obviously the latter albums (except the Meninblack) pretty much tapped into the mood at the time
I loved the rawness of punk,had some great nights down the Rank & Brighton Poly
but the Stranglers always had a little more to offer
they headlined the first night at Reading & supported the Who at Wembley,an average punk band couldn't do this
Down In The Sewer,Walk On By,they were/are very accomplished musicians also
Funnily enough, I was thinking of Down In The Sewer as an example of why they weren't specifically punk. Plus, it wasn't an overnight thing for them; they'd done the rounds of poxy little pub gigs for a while whilst the Pistols were kind of put together for a purpose and inspired the likes of Buzzcocks and, to an extent The Clash (101ers and Mick's Mott influences aside) to go for it.
I often wondered whether or not someone like Dr Feelgood (with better timing and a harder sound/look) could have been 'The Stranglers' given their similar background of 'doing the rounds'.
But agree they were bloody good musicians - which kind of flies in the face of what punk was all about!
the Jam are another good example,not really punk,but profitted by it at the time
Punk or New Wave where do they start/end
I would probably say 76-77 was considered punk and maybe early 78
late 78 and 79 was probably the cross over to new wave
before the new romantics arrived,when was that late 81 early 82?
To be fair though, Charlie Harper was already middle aged when the UK Subs decided to cash in on the tail end of punk. Bloke's probably due a telegram from Queen,assuming he's still alive and not constantly touring villages in Switzerland with his kids and grand kids.