TomandJerry
Well-known member
- Oct 1, 2013
- 12,522
- Thread starter
- #5,301
Why?It's an absolutely f***ing terrible idea.
Why?It's an absolutely f***ing terrible idea.
For the reasons others have posted.Why?
Yes they are viewed as negative but there are positive ones too.For the reasons others have posted.
What business is it of the Government to tell people what they should and shouldn’t be doing about having children?Yes they are viewed as negative but there are positive ones too.
Easy.The cost of a Rwanda policy is insane.
To fly 20,000 plus 'illegal' boat crossers to Rwanda: Four billion pounds a year.
How is Reform going to pay for that?
Reform aren't telling people to have children.What business is it of the Government to tell people what they should and shouldn’t be doing about having children?
I think you know the answer.
The logic is similar to that which drove people in their thousands to elect as Euro MPs,
members of the Brexit party.
Because obviously electing Nigel so he could collect a £200K wedge for rarely turning up in the EU parliament,
was the way to go if you disliked the EU.
I can only assume the half-wits who vote reform simply dislike our own political system.
Trashing parliament and making central government unravel is probably good in their eyes.
Presumably the sooner local affairs are put back in the hands of the largest local landowners the better.
Down with democrasy. Let the local strongman tell the peasants what to do.
Actually, I am beginning to like the sound of that.
Except our largest local landowner is not Bob Geldof, but a shell company based in the Isle of Man.
Oh well![]()
We've already had that Brexit Benefit!
As a non-voter I'm guessing you're happy with whatever any politician or party does?Ha ha ha ha ha!
This is Ncs Gold!
As a non voter, virtual hugs for you all.
Edit:
(Ps.. only virtual hugs to the people who choose to have them)
But not willing to pay for autistic children because they get diagnosed so easily by GPs on Zoom calls.Reform aren't telling people to have children.
They are trying to make having children more affordable.
I just wondered if you saw the analysis of Reform's economic policies by the Institute for Fiscal Studies ? By their reckoning Reforms fiscal plans are 'tens of billions of pounds out'. Also I wonder if you knew that Reform want to put us back on the Gold Standard ? The last time this happened we experienced mass unemployment. I just wonder if these policies are going to make children [or anything] more affordable.Reform aren't telling people to have children.
They are trying to make having children more affordable.
It could be you
She has now added to this by saying that she doesn't like Farage.My mother-in-law lives in Derbyshire, where Reform now control the CC, and said that she "voted Labour but is glad that Reform got the Conservatives out".
I have no idea how to understand that train of thought.
There lots of things Reform want to do which aren’t widely known or publicised. The press will really have to step up to make things clear.I just wondered if you saw the analysis of Reform's economic policies by the Institute for Fiscal Studies ? By their reckoning Reforms fiscal plans are 'tens of billions of pounds out'. Also I wonder if you knew that Reform want to put us back on the Gold Standard ? The last time this happened we experienced mass unemployment. I just wonder if these policies are going to make children [or anything] more affordable.
Thank godShe has now added to this by saying that she doesn't like Farage.
Unlike the main parties who DO explain what they will do then do the exact opposite.There lots of things Reform want to do which aren’t widely known or publicised. The press will really have to step up to make things clear.
By crashing the economy? Bold choice.Reform aren't telling people to have children.
They are trying to make having children more affordable.