[News] Nigel Farage and Reform

[Guinness Boy]

What do YOU think they should be, it's a Raquel from Accounts policy after all?

I asked you first and you clearly don’t have an answer. Therefore you’ll whinge whatever they are, because opposition is easy and governance is hard.

Which, to get back to THIS thread is why Reform are nothing more than a protest vote.

 

[Is it PotG?]

I asked you first and you clearly don’t have an answer. Therefore you’ll whinge whatever they are, because opposition is easy and governance is hard.

Which, to get back to THUS thread is why Reform are nothing more than a protest vote.

Going by the last election and future ones with our FPtP, most votes will either be tactical or protest.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Bringing back the Zia chap.

Zia left of his own accord and returned days later of his own accord.
Do keep up

 

[Guinness Boy]

Going by the last election and future ones with our FPtP, most votes will either be tactical or protest.

Does it matter when they’re “all the same”?

 

[Nobby]

What do you think they should be?

Don’t ask sensible questions ffs

 

[Pevenseagull]

Bringing back the Zia chap.

Nah, that was their major donor raking on a new DOGE role in the party. He reflected on Reform being represented in parliament by racists and decided he wanted to be a part of it .... For some reason that I can't for the life of me work our.

 

[WATFORD zero]

Does it matter when they’re “all the same”?

That's the term for when it dawns that they have backed and done something really stupid, it is now apparent that what they backed and voted for is really stupid, and they really don't want to take any responsibility for the disaster arising out of the stupid thing they've backed and done.

"Well it doesn't matter because they are all the same" apparently makes the thing they've done less stupid

 

[Is it PotG?]

Does it matter when they’re “all the same”?

They are, and we all get what no bugger wants.

Fantastic, glad you're happy mate.

 

[Is it PotG?]

That's the term for when it dawns that they have backed and done something really stupid, it is now apparent that what they backed and voted for is really stupid, and they really don't want to take any responsibility for the disaster arising out of the stupid thing they've backed and done.

"Well it doesn't matter because they are all the same" apparently makes the thing they've done less stupid

Nice edit!

 

[darkwolf666]

Yes, Starmer knows that competence and doing the right thing will never be as good as offering a chance to go back to being Bournemouth in 1970. Far easier to be on the sidelines saying " We would have done things differently " but without being specific. So, Starmer has seen the books and has to do lots of jiggereypokerey in order to rebuild the country and move forward as well as placate the media and the knuckledraggers. Tough gig..

About covers it…

 

[Bodian]

What do YOU think they should be, it's a Raquel from Accounts policy after all?

I think it's a fair question to ask of you though. You said that we'd need to see the thresholds before applauding / celebrating - so what threshold would it need to be to get your applause?

 

[Is it PotG?]

I think it's a fair question to ask of you though. You said that we'd need to see the thresholds before applauding / celebrating - so what threshold would it need to be to get your applause?

Why do YOU think Starmer and Reeves have performed such a massive U-Turn?

 

[Bodian]

Why do YOU think Starmer and Reeves have performed such a massive U-Turn?

That's a separate question altogether. Why are you avoiding the initial question?