[News] Nigel Farage and Reform

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
39,491
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
What do YOU think they should be, it's a Raquel from Accounts policy after all?
I asked you first and you clearly don’t have an answer. Therefore you’ll whinge whatever they are, because opposition is easy and governance is hard.

Which, to get back to THIS thread is why Reform are nothing more than a protest vote.
 




Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
27,263
Sussex by the Sea
I asked you first and you clearly don’t have an answer. Therefore you’ll whinge whatever they are, because opposition is easy and governance is hard.

Which, to get back to THUS thread is why Reform are nothing more than a protest vote.
Going by the last election and future ones with our FPtP, most votes will either be tactical or protest.
 










Jul 20, 2003
21,746
Bringing back the Zia chap.


Nah, that was their major donor raking on a new DOGE role in the party. He reflected on Reform being represented in parliament by racists and decided he wanted to be a part of it .... For some reason that I can't for the life of me work our.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
29,433
Does it matter when they’re “all the same”?

That's the term for when it dawns that they have backed and done something really stupid, it is now apparent that what they backed and voted for is really stupid, and they really don't want to take any responsibility for the disaster arising out of the stupid thing they've backed and done.

"Well it doesn't matter because they are all the same" apparently makes the thing they've done less stupid :dunce:
 
Last edited:






Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
27,263
Sussex by the Sea
That's the term for when it dawns that they have backed and done something really stupid, it is now apparent that what they backed and voted for is really stupid, and they really don't want to take any responsibility for the disaster arising out of the stupid thing they've backed and done.

"Well it doesn't matter because they are all the same" apparently makes the thing they've done less stupid :dunce:
Nice edit!
 


darkwolf666

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2015
8,333
Sittingbourne, Kent
Yes, Starmer knows that competence and doing the right thing will never be as good as offering a chance to go back to being Bournemouth in 1970. Far easier to be on the sidelines saying " We would have done things differently " but without being specific. So, Starmer has seen the books and has to do lots of jiggereypokerey in order to rebuild the country and move forward as well as placate the media and the knuckledraggers. Tough gig..
About covers it…
 










darkwolf666

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2015
8,333
Sittingbourne, Kent
That's a separate question altogether. Why are you avoiding the initial question?
Because nobody REALLY has THE answers, on these boards OR in the House.

It's far, far easier to tell people where they are going wrong rather than either offer sensible advice as to how things could be made better, or what THEY would ACTUALLY do.

Ultimately, Party politics will NEVER allow for things to be done in the interests of the public, only the party at the end of the day!
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top