Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

New threads about old subjects?







Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
58,825
Back in Sussex
f*** it - I'll come up with some rules.

But one thing will remain constant - if people try and test where the line is, and they trip over that line as a result, they may not be able to play with the ball for a while or ever again.

I think most have enough common sense, Safeway excluded, obviously...
 


Robot Chicken

Seriously?
Jul 5, 2003
13,154
Chicken World
If it's not advisable to bounce old threads then why aren't they being deleted beyond say page three? As you said on Brightonfans, the vast majority of people don't go past page one.

Some older threads are fun to read again (GG rants etc) so it would be a shame to delete them but I think this has all been a storm in a teacup caused by boredom...
 




MRRF 10

New member
Downloaded Penguin said:
If it's not advisable to bounce old threads then why aren't they being deleted beyond say page three? As you said on Brightonfans, the vast majority of people don't go past page one.

Some older threads are fun to read again (GG rants etc) so it would be a shame to delete them but I think this has all been a storm in a teacup caused by boredom...


I agree with that, although maybe it ought to be page five or ten, as i normally go to page 4 or 5 when coming online


Trotster said:
:( sorry bozza

can i have my ball back please?


:lolol:



:jester:
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
58,825
Back in Sussex
We could periodically prune but I don't see what the point is. Some threads do become relevant again and can be 'retrieved' and brought back to life. This is fine if you are adding some substance to the thread but to purely bounce a thread with a smilie is adding nothing at all. To do this 30 or 40 times over completely ruins the flow of the board.
 


Bozza's right, bouncing a thread to wreck the flow of the board is moronic, it just pisses on the real postings that people have made and that won't get read as a result. I've hardened my view on this, forced transportation back to NSP is too good for 'em I say.

But bouncing a thread to make an observation or point WITHIN THE THREAD is another thing entirely and can be quite enlightening and/or amusing *he added rather self-servingly*.
 


Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
It is interesting and relevant to look back over the season to see who thought Steve Coppout was the best thing since sliced bread and Mark McGhee absolute rubbish etc (with the benefit of hindsight of course)

As for relieving boredom at work then come up with some good quizes (sp) or Family fortunes or something?
Use your imaginations. It works wonders for boredom and entertains others.
 




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
20,285
'Threadbouncinggate' - This could run and run.
 


GUNTER

New member
Jul 9, 2003
4,373
Brighton
We need to archive all the old threads as often there is stuff that DOES become relevant. Peoples thoughts or predictions at a particular time are always interesting (FG's Magoo Out for example after he had been at the club one week or me calling for the arrival of Iwelumo three months before he arrived).

I also had the pleasure of trying a "cheese topped bap" that reminded me of an old thread, which I posted on after I had sampled one.

Don't delete them!
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here