London Calling
New member
- Thread starter
- #81
Like all wars and battles, skirmishes take place. Cortonwood was that skirmish.
Whether the Union could poltically not have backed then? I agree they probably couldn"t. Whether an all out strike was the best cause of action at that time of year, I do doubt. The NUM should have drawn matters out into the summer.
Whilst I won't disagree with the collective leadership. The NUM leadership I would say had all the approaches of Stalinism. The core of this leadership was Yorkshire, the Regional Branch members, I believe, put their own career and ego's first and not their members interests.
Without knowing any of this level of leadership personally, did they really agree with the tactics of 1984? Or, Did they just scratch each other backs or were they so far up their collective backsides they just did not realise what was really going to happen over that 12 months and beyond.
Did they really believe that the Government would go through the colliery closure programme?
I will disagree with the NACODS scenario. They went out on strike for the same reasons as the NUM. Whilst the Deputies were out, the NUM did not even had to go on strike. Macgregor offered the NACODS a ( and would have had to offer the NUM the same) good deal. But the offering met the NACODS demands and also the NUM's. THe NUM sadly wanted more. The NUM leadership did not realise that it had won this battle.
The rest I think between ourselves we have perfectly summed up one of the worst 3 years of UK modern history.
LC
Whether the Union could poltically not have backed then? I agree they probably couldn"t. Whether an all out strike was the best cause of action at that time of year, I do doubt. The NUM should have drawn matters out into the summer.
Whilst I won't disagree with the collective leadership. The NUM leadership I would say had all the approaches of Stalinism. The core of this leadership was Yorkshire, the Regional Branch members, I believe, put their own career and ego's first and not their members interests.
Without knowing any of this level of leadership personally, did they really agree with the tactics of 1984? Or, Did they just scratch each other backs or were they so far up their collective backsides they just did not realise what was really going to happen over that 12 months and beyond.
Did they really believe that the Government would go through the colliery closure programme?
I will disagree with the NACODS scenario. They went out on strike for the same reasons as the NUM. Whilst the Deputies were out, the NUM did not even had to go on strike. Macgregor offered the NACODS a ( and would have had to offer the NUM the same) good deal. But the offering met the NACODS demands and also the NUM's. THe NUM sadly wanted more. The NUM leadership did not realise that it had won this battle.
The rest I think between ourselves we have perfectly summed up one of the worst 3 years of UK modern history.
LC
Last edited: