[Albion] Manchester United vs Brighton & Hove Albion *** Official Match Thread ***

[macbeth]

this is the most pissed off I've been from watching a game in a long, long time

 

[trueblue]

Straight red so 3 I would guess

Only 1 for denying a goalscoring opportunity.

 

[dstanman]

So how many games is Dunk out for

 

[nicko31]

One of those days, with 11 men these over rated over paid twats wouldn't have beaten us

Still a decent performance, paid price for a mad 2 minutes

 

[Deadly Danson]

Without VAR that's a straight red no questions asked. Ref gave a yellow to cover his arse if Webster was closer than he looked.

I would have had no real complaints if he was shown a straight red and VAR didnt intervene. Point is he didn't because he thought Webster was covering. The replays don't prove anything so VAR shouldn't have got involved.

 

[Amexarmadillo]

We would have got something out of that if it wasn’t for the disgraceful red card decision as we were by far the better team up until that point. Why have they got someone from a micky mouse league on VAR? Whenever I’ve seen Gillett involved in anything since he came to the Premier League from the A League, he’s looked completely out of his depth.

It wasn’t a disgraceful decision it was shockingly poor from Lewis. All the pundits in the TV studio saying right decision. People need to take off the blue tinted glasses

 

[paulfuzz]

Played well, but just those silly few minutes.

How unlucky is Moder.......keep going the goals will come

He is just getting better and better..........InGear was never getting to that!!

 

[Stato]

Dunk's dismissal makes selection interesting with no Dan Burn.

Shane Duffy will love a game against that Burnley giant.

 

[pure_white]

I just wanna say 3 things:
1. i HATE ronaldo
2. Modar my fav player QUALITY
3. We must convert more chances as we could've been 2 or 3 up at HT and game almost over. Heads high the score did not reflect the performance. Bounce back Saturday.

 

[jcdenton08]

One of those days, with 11 men these over rated over paid twats wouldn't have beaten us

Our overpaid twats would get a good result instead?

 

[Farehamseagull]

Well, it's because Webster was in a position to deny a clear goalscoring chance

No he wasn’t.

But anyway, even if you do genuinely believe that Webster has super human powers to get back to him, it’s hardly a disgraceful decision is it when the majority of people and all neutrals think it’s a red?!

 

[LamieRobertson]

It wasn’t a disgraceful decision it was shockingly poor from Lewis. All the pundits in the TV studio saying right decision. People need to take off the blue tinted glasses

Ooooh get you

 

[paulfuzz]

this is the most pissed off I've been from watching a game in a long, long time

Its the Manure thing isn't it.??......me tooo!!

 

[Amexarmadillo]

Straight red so 3 I would guess

No it’s only 3 for dangerous play.

 

[portslade seagull]

Only 1 for denying a goalscoring opportunity.

Yeah your correct, 3 is for serious foul play

 

[Terry Butcher Tribute Act]

It wasn’t a disgraceful decision it was shockingly poor from Lewis. All the pundits in the TV studio saying right decision. People need to take off the blue tinted glasses

Agreed. Can't believe people are moaning about that.

Good game, 1-1 would have been a fair result. United awful first half, we gave it to them in the second on a plate. But even with 10 that was a decent showing.

Beating Burnley is more important really.

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

Win-Win. Had we won Potter would definitely have been hoovered up by United post-Rangnick.

 

[Nobby Cybergoat]

No he wasn’t.

But anyway, even if you do genuinely believe that Webster has super human powers to get back to him, it’s hardly a disgraceful decision is it when the majority of people and all neutrals think it’s a red?!

I wouldn't form too many opinions on the basis of what Andy Townsend thinks to be honest mate

 

[paulfuzz]

No it’s only 3 for dangerous play.

I think we need a poll

 

[pb21]

I would have had no real complaints if he was shown a straight red and VAR didnt intervene. Point is he didn't because he thought Webster was covering. The replays don't prove anything so VAR shouldn't have got involved.

You have a point, did the ref initially make a clear and obvious error? I'm not sure he did.