Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Main Coronavirus / Covid-19 Discussion Thread



sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,756
town full of eejits
The fatal flaw in this post is that people aren't trusting "politicians", they're trusting "scientists". Which is why now in the countries which have deviated from the scientific advice (e.g. Brazil, the US, the UK) the popularity of their Governments is falling, whereas the politicians which have followed the advice of the scientists are already reaping rewards (see Jacinda Ardern).

Jacinda Ardern lives on a tiny island on the arse end of nowhere mate .........4 million population max ......you are comparing Liverpool to Angmering ....get real.:bigwave:
 




LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
46,847
SHOREHAM BY SEA
The media are to blame for focussing on the closure of pubs and the people moaning about the Government .
Instead they should be telling of the thousands admitted to hospital with Covid and the hundreds dying all the time with it.
They seem determined to make this political. What do they want? Freedom to please themselves? Then they would slam Boris for inactivity.
Show us hospitals....interview the bereaved.That is the real story....

Media broadcast the numbers etc every day ..plenty there about what you refer to the ‘real story’ ..indeed they only focused on that for some months and not the wider picture
 


The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
I didn't believe this to start with, but it is happening.
Quite ludicrous, Drakeford has surely lost the plot.

4B8C6CEB-A793-46BB-ABE0-5E946B6BC45D.jpeg

It’s genuinely hard to believe isn’t it :facepalm:
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,919
View attachment 129734

It’s genuinely hard to believe isn’t it :facepalm:

No, it really isn't. If you force non-essential businesses such as card shops, clothes shops, cookware shops etc, to close, why would you then let the multinational Supermarkets, who are open to sell food and drink, take the whole of the market from the shops you forcibly close, pushing them closer to going out of business ? Seems like common sense to me :shrug:

Unless you think that purchasing a birthday card is an essential during a pandemic ?
 
Last edited:


atomised

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2013
5,117
No, it really isn't. If you force non-essential businesses such as card shops, clothes shops, cookware shops etc, to close, why would you then let the multinational Supermarkets, who are open to sell food and drink, take the whole of the market from the shops you forcibly close, pushing them closer to going out of business ? Seems like common sense to me :shrug:

Unless you think that purchasing a birthday card is an essential during a pandemic ?

I would say some children who are suffering quite enough already would be disappointed at not getting birthday cards etc so even if not essential purchase should be allowed
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,919
I would say some children who are suffering quite enough already would be disappointed at not getting birthday cards etc so even if not essential purchase should be allowed

Then campaign to make card shops an exception to the 'essentials rule' the same as food and drink.

I wouldn't myself, but it's all about opinions :shrug:
 


The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
No, it really isn't. If you force non-essential businesses such as card shops, clothes shops, cookware shops etc, to close, why would you then let the multinational Supermarkets, who are open to sell food and drink, take the whole of the market from the shops you forcibly close, pushing them closer to going out of business ? Seems like common sense to me :shrug:

Unless you think that purchasing a birthday card is an essential during a pandemic ?

So for the entire period of lockdown nobody is allowed to buy anything other than food and drink? Absolutely ridiculous. All people will do is go on Amazon or Moonpig etc and that serves no good for the local economy.

How anyone can label this nonsense as common sense genuinely staggers me, people still need to buy other things and all this will do is make people go online, if you genuinely think someone who needs something other than food is going to think ‘oh I will wait for that local shop to open back up’ instead of just going online then I honestly have no words.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,919
So for the entire period of lockdown nobody is allowed to buy anything other than food and drink? Absolutely ridiculous. All people will do is go on Amazon or Moonpig etc and that serves no good for the local economy.

How anyone can label this nonsense as common sense genuinely staggers me, people still need to buy other things and all this will do is make people go online, if you genuinely think someone who needs something other than food is going to think ‘oh I will wait for that local shop to open back up’ instead of just going online then I honestly have no words.

You're happy to see the multinational supermarkets put specialist shops out of business, I'm not. I believe that if you introduce rules, those same rules should apply to all businesses, you don't.

I wouldn't dream of calling your views Absolutely ridiculous, but as this little exchange has shown, we are obviously very different people :shrug:
 




The Wizard

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2009
18,383
You're happy to see the multinational supermarkets put specialist shops out of business, I'm not. I believe that if you introduce rules, those same rules should apply to all businesses, you don't.

I wouldn't dream of calling your views Absolutely ridiculous, but as this little exchange has shown, we are obviously very different people :shrug:

If it’s a choice between supporting Tesco or Asda that employ thousands of local people or amazon, I know which one I’d prefer to support.
 




dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
52,617
Burgess Hill
My suspicion is in about five years time we will look back on all this as an overreaction and realise it would have run it’s course whatever we did .I don’t believe the NHS was ever in danger of being overrun. Nightingale hospitals stood empty and unused etc.
I realise this is not a popular opinion and expect a roasting for it but something about this whole mess does not add up. I’m not really buying it anymore.

The Nightingales were a contingency......when they were set up, hospitals were heading to breaking point in terms of ITU capacity etc. Lockdown - just - slowed things in time to mean they weren’t needed.

Big fear now is another exponential explosion in numbers obviously - could easily spiral out of control very, very quickly, particularly as we’re heading into winter. Add all the ‘usual’ winter hospital admissions to that through flu etc to Covid cases and very quickly the system falls over.

We can’t, though, continue like this.......for me, we have to pin hopes on an effective vaccine (and things look - to me at least - far more positive than others seem to think on that front with so many independent efforts progressing - see pic below), and immediately target the more vulnerable with that first, with ‘everyone else’ starting to return to normal recognising that for the vast majority of non-vulnerable people the illness isn’t serious (and where it is, with the vulnerable vaccinated, the NHS won’t be overwhelmed with cases).

012879617071cdcb5ff3daa10570776d.jpg
 




sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,756
town full of eejits
No, it really isn't. If you force non-essential businesses such as card shops, clothes shops, cookware shops etc, to close, why would you then let the multinational Supermarkets, who are open to sell food and drink, take the whole of the market from the shops you forcibly close, pushing them closer to going out of business ? Seems like common sense to me :shrug:

Unless you think that purchasing a birthday card is an essential during a pandemic ?

:rolleyes: how's your hedge fund....?? ffs it might be the last birthday card some people ever get.
 


e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,268
Worthing
the 90 % , low risk punters who are under lockdown around the globe are also under some inconvenience wouldn't you say .....??

You are comparing the experience of someone dying with someone living under restrictions?
 


sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,756
town full of eejits
You are comparing the experience of someone dying with someone living under restrictions?

im comparing the death of a chronically ill 80 yr old with the locking down of a perfectly fit and healthy 25 yr old and the financial yolk that will be shoved in their face for the next 15 years or longer knowing the bunch of goons running the country/planet.
 




e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,268
Worthing
im comparing the death of a chronically ill 80 yr old with the locking down of a perfectly fit and healthy 25 yr old and the financial yolk that will be shoved in their face for the next 15 years or longer knowing the bunch of goons running the country/planet.

So how many people dying in the UK do you think is acceptable to not have any restrictions?

No waffle, just give a figure.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,329
No, it really isn't. If you force non-essential businesses such as card shops, clothes shops, cookware shops etc, to close, why would you then let the multinational Supermarkets, who are open to sell food and drink, take the whole of the market from the shops you forcibly close, pushing them closer to going out of business ? Seems like common sense to me :shrug:

not really, it doesnt help a single non-essential shop, while pissing off anyone needing everyday items. its just petty and bureaucratic. but then closing the shops in the first place is unnecessary. Welsh government has gone a bit mental with blanket national response when only a few southern valley districts have high rates.
 


sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,756
town full of eejits
So how many people dying in the UK do you think is acceptable to not have any restrictions?

No waffle, just give a figure.

it's not about the figure , it's about the effect on every day life and the politicians making out they know best when clearly they don't ....all sorts of figures being slung about re. annual deaths from flu and pneumonia 40-50 k per year...mostly elderly , acceptable ...?? impossible to answer we are nudging 50 k now no..?
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,919
not really, it doesnt help a single non-essential shop, while pissing off anyone needing everyday items. its just petty and bureaucratic. but then closing the shops in the first place is unnecessary. Welsh government has gone a bit mental with blanket national response when only a few southern valley districts have high rates.

To be fair, there is an argument whether they should be closing shops full stop, but surely if you decide that only essential items are sold then only essential items should be sold. If one shop isn't allowed to open because they sell clothes, deemed 'not essential' then other shops should also follow suit and not sell 'non essential' clothes :shrug:

And I would suggest that closing card shops whilst letting supermarkets sell cards in their place is the very essence of 'not helping non-essential shops' stay in business.
 
Last edited:




e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,268
Worthing
it's not about the figure , it's about the effect on every day life and the politicians making out they know best when clearly they don't ....all sorts of figures being slung about re. annual deaths from flu and pneumonia 40-50 k per year...mostly elderly , acceptable ...?? impossible to answer we are nudging 50 k now no..?

Ok, as you don't want to answer let's play a game.

500,000 die in exchange for the lifting of all restrictions. Deal or no deal?
 


darkwolf666

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2015
7,576
Sittingbourne, Kent
it's not about the figure , it's about the effect on every day life and the politicians making out they know best when clearly they don't ....all sorts of figures being slung about re. annual deaths from flu and pneumonia 40-50 k per year...mostly elderly , acceptable ...?? impossible to answer we are nudging 50 k now no..?

Or you can read this for the facts...

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsduetocoronaviruscovid19comparedwithdeathsfrominfluenzaandpneumoniaenglandandwales/deathsoccurringbetween1januaryand31august2020
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here