Not me. That genuinely was never my intention, but you made it clear you didn't believe me and sadly still don't. I'm not saying any more as it will upset Zeberdi.…as opposed to starting threads to have a pop at the Labour Party?
Seems like a thread of people commenting on an interesting article about a local club so they can have a pop at Tories, The Telegraph, The Mail, critics of woke ideals, and very little about the content from reading it or from local, maybe informed knowledge. Oh, hang on, they won't have read it. How very NSC. Must admit, I read the article and made my own judgements on a local club that's struggling. How very naive of me.
Childish and inaccurate, but whatever. Gammon is so last year.
Yes, no mention that when the BBC spoke to 31 non league clubs recently, 29 reported they were in financial difficulties.Please: use their correct title (as per the Daily Mail website today) of Woke FC.
Obviously they were gleefully reporting that Lewes are struggling to continue, due to their overwhelming WOKENESS resulting in them being a financial disaster.
I didn't bother reading the comments, mainly because they would have been from complete twats.
Childish and inaccurate, but whatever. Gammon is so last year.![]()
Playing in non-league is also woke.Yes, no mention that when the BBC spoke to 31 non league clubs recently, 29 reported they were in financial difficulties.
Match day tickets are/were, season tickets not( but the women have half the games)Season tickets are identically priced.
They pretty much did until last season, attendances slightly higher for men's, ticket prices the sameWhich would be a great argument if they then generated the same money from gate receipts etc, but they don’t
They both work out at £10.50 a game ? That’s the same?Match day tickets are/were, season tickets not( but the women have half the games)
You're struggling with that one. Back to your homework if you're old enough.
Sorry yes, price per game may be but the season ticket itself is differentThey both work out at £10.50 a game ? That’s the same?
You're struggling with that one. Back to your homework if you're old enough.
Not me. That genuinely was never my intention, but you made it clear you didn't believe me and sadly still don't. I'm not saying any more as it will upset Zeberdi.
Wow. I read all the 'rag's for balance. But I'm not surprised you've run out of words. Stick to the pictures.Not really. Just calling out your bleating about all the bad people on NSC saying nasty things about your favourite right wing rags. Not unexpected of course.
Nothing more to say really.
Wow. I read all the 'rag's for balance. But I'm not surprised you've run out of words. Stick to the pictures.
Quite. Think the women probably brought way more money into the club than the men when they were in T2. Certainly Lewes wouldn't have got a nice new pitch without them because the FA paid for it. I also understand potential women's sponsors were put off when told their funds would be equally split between men and women.But people earn more based on the revenue they bring in. Top Camogie players earn a fraction of the salary of top footballers, because nobody watches or gives a shit about camogie.
In Lewes’s case, it isn’t so much the attendances which are fairly equal across both teams, but all the other expenses incurred with running two professional clubs simulataneously when all the other expenses are taken into account.
It was hugely ambitious and well meant, but completely impractical from a business perspective.
Probably about the same in Lewes' caseWhich would be a great argument if they then generated the same money from gate receipts etc, but they don’t