- Thread starter
- #21
Yeates as well would be good.
Kinky Gerbils said:Yeates as well would be good.
B.W. said:Another good suggestion... why not?... we need a bit of creativity in midfield...
LANGDON SEAGULL said:I believe we won more games without Oatway than with
mejonaNO12 aka riskit said:then why not michael carrick? oh no hes a holding player, dont want him.
The Large One said:Oatway brings something to the team which no other player in the squad can currently do - and sense of fight, passion, leadership. Admittedly, that says more about the others than it does about Charlie, but your insinuation that he holds little value to the team doesn't stand up.
B.W. said:... because he is clearly not a realistic proposition
Debo said:A player that would be very useful, affordable is young but has a good record at our current level and also fits the profile of the the type of striker the clubs says it needs. Is Pavel Abbot of Huddersfield.
He apparently almost went to to MK Dons the other week, and is said to be surplus to requirements up there. I know of his abilty from the time he spent at Bury on loan from Preston, he then went on to do very well in Hudderfield's promotion year.
If he is anywhere close to that, he would be an excellent addition to the team, even at the expense of my own CKR. The only thing would be getting him to come. That said I dont think he is in the reckoning at all up there, so an initial loan period may suite both the club and the player.
chez said:
Debo said:A player that would be very useful, affordable is young but has a good record at our current level and also fits the profile of the the type of striker the clubs says it needs. Is Pavel Abbot of Huddersfield.
He apparently almost went to to MK Dons the other week, and is said to be surplus to requirements up there. I know of his abilty from the time he spent at Bury on loan from Preston, he then went on to do very well in Hudderfield's promotion year.
If he is anywhere close to that, he would be an excellent addition to the team, even at the expense of my own CKR. The only thing would be getting him to come. That said I dont think he is in the reckoning at all up there, so an initial loan period may suite both the club and the player.
Superb post, couldn't agree more.West Hoathly Seagull said:Speak to Matt Hicks and he will tell you that Charlie is just one of a number of senior professionals at the Albion who formed a sort of "umbrella" over the whole squad and set the standards for the rest to behave - the others were Nathan Jones, Danny Cullip and Paul Watson and before them Paul Rogers. With them in the dressing room, a self-obsessed boastful little arse like Knight would never have got away with the rubbish he did - Cullip at the very least would have had very severe words with him and probably thumped him, nor would Kuipers have got away with the strop at Southampton or his treatment of Lynch at Sheffield United. Regardless of what one thinks of McGhee, and my opinion on him is not relevant to my points here, a manager needs leaders in the dressing room to back him up and Charlie was the last remnant of this. Okay, he was around on the sidelines once he had had his operation, but clearly he couldn't have had the day-to-day influence he or that group had before. I think that has played a considerable part in the lack of team spirit we saw in the second half of last season, and whatever those who will defend the set-up against any criticism say, it clearly wasn't there in 2006. As for Barnard, yes please, but I don't think it's likely. A season-long loan at somewhere like West Brom is more likely. Again I suspect wages would be the sticking point.
BarrelofFun said:Could you make it happen, Debo?
Not sure I would want him to replace CKR, although I haven't seen much of Abbot.