Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Katie Price - claiming benefits



El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
I used to have a bit of time for her until I discovered first hand (well second hand though my wife) the truth behind exactly how much effort she puts into looking after Harvey. Put bluntly, her mum does everything.

I disagree, I think you will find that Katie feeds Harvey every day, admittedly it's Fanta and Monster Munch, but it is something!
 








Ernest

Stupid IDIOT
Nov 8, 2003
42,739
LOONEY BIN
Cameron is a hypocrite as he was only too keen to claim every penny he was entitled to in benefits but demonises other people doing the same, he didn't need the money for his child care costs but still claimed it the same way he used the parliamentary expenses yet paints others as the enemy.

I wonder how many frothing at the mouth Tory boys on here claim child benefits ?
 


BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Why should her son not get it, it isnt here that is receiving the benefit of the taxi etc? He /she is entitled to it more so than some layabout man and wife with 10 children whocant afford to work as they would lose money. At least she is paying her taxes and probably a lot more than anybody posting on here.
 




Nitram

Well-known member
Jul 16, 2013
2,178
Harvey isn't a multi millionaire, so he shouldn't be treated differently.

As much as I find Katie Price a Frankenstein's monster of recent times, and her wealth and fame is due to suckers buying her celebrity and endorsements, she is entitled to claim assistance for her son's upbringing as is any parent.

I'm all for debate about the vacuous nature of her lifestyle, but we live in a society that has universal rights in terms of education and healthcare, so why shouldn't her son be a recipient any more or any less than the child of parents from a poor family?

If you don't believe that the NHS should provide such a service, and instead should be privatised, the answer is simple #VoteUKIP

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/01/24/ukip-pr-man-matthew-richardson-says-farages-party-should-represent-bigots_n_6539276.html
So the essence of your debate is to call me a bigot, what an appropriate name for someone so high and mighty. The debate was quite civil until you turned up. I could point you back to what I have previously written but what's the point to someone who would rather insult than debate.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,719
Pattknull med Haksprut
So the essence of your debate is to call me a bigot, what an appropriate name for someone so high and mighty. The debate was quite civil until you turned up. I could point you back to what I have previously written but what's the point to someone who would rather insult than debate.

Where have I called you a bigot?

The NHS was set up Bevan to provide universal health care for everyone in this country, regardless of their background. It has been the cornerstone of this country in the post war period, although it has been chipped away by both parties in power when it suited them, the central commitment of if you are sick we will treat you has always been applied.

Your view is that a 13 year old child with severe disabilities should have his care provided for by his mother, rather than being given support by the state on the grounds that she is wealthy. I'm merely disagreeing.

However, there is an alternative to that now being put forward by a senior member of one of the political parties.
 








Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
42,857
Lancing
I disagree, I think you will find that Katie feeds Harvey every day, admittedly it's Fanta and Monster Munch, but it is something!

His size is due to the medical condition he is suffering from
 




symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
I would only question why Harvey needs to go to London every day for special schooling because I am surprised that there isn’t anywhere locally that can provide the same service. It cannot be that much fun for him, in his condition, to spend 3-4 hours daily in a car. So the logistics of it is a problem for me if there is a better alternative.

With regard to the money it is costing, it doesn’t go into her pocket, it goes back into the system via the people who are employed for the service provided, and then they themselves are taxed on their earnings. The money isn’t really lost, it is distributed and recycled through the UK’s economy.
 


father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
For all of those advocated that the rich shouldn't get state handouts because they can afford to pay for it themselves, I offer the following argument to the debate.

Katy Price HAS paid for the taxi and nurse to get her son to school. She pays the UK government a considerable sum of money (and even if she has an army of tax specialists minimising her liability as a percentage of her income, it still represents a significant pound amount). I would wager in fact that she pays in a single year more than most of us would contribute in a working life.
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,318
Can't believe Yorke just gave up knowing his child - I assume as he had a disability (think this was 'public' knowledge but apologies if i'm wrong). Peter Andre has always come across a decent fella and I believe still see's Harvey as he took him on as his own.
 




BLOCK F

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2009
6,385
I really don't see the big 'outrage deal' about this.
Does this mean, for example, because she could pay for Harvey to be taken wherever he needs to go, that everyone who has sufficient funds to pay should never get free treatment from their GP or hospital,but should always go private?
Not quite the same and some people would say yes,but you get my drift.
 


Ernest

Stupid IDIOT
Nov 8, 2003
42,739
LOONEY BIN
For all of those advocated that the rich shouldn't get state handouts because they can afford to pay for it themselves, I offer the following argument to the debate.

Katy Price HAS paid for the taxi and nurse to get her son to school. She pays the UK government a considerable sum of money (and even if she has an army of tax specialists minimising her liability as a percentage of her income, it still represents a significant pound amount). I would wager in fact that she pays in a single year more than most of us would contribute in a working life.

Rubbish, the benefit system is not universal unlike the NHS and if you can afford to pay then you should pay and if you have tax advisers and thus not paying your fair share even more so
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,369
Again, she has not made over £ 40m from a pair of tits, see above, £ 21.8m of that has come from her books, probably less than a million came from her topless work

books ghost written about her life as a celebrity with a pair of tits, or "novels" about being a celebrity (not sure if they feature tits tbf). hardly JK Rowling is it.
 


Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
30,695
Yeah, this.

At least the slapper is paying her taxes in this country (I assume anyway) unlike Lewis bloody Hamilton who smells a bit of success and ****s off to live in Monaco.

The grand prix season is 10 months long including testing, and his girlfriend lives in the States. Therefore, I doubt whether he actually spends more than 90 days in Monaco in any given year. I'd probably do the same if I was him.
 




Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
70,479
Katie Price seems to me to be a good mum compared to some. She's not always flaunting herself in public, but she has to earn a crust. She's got five kids which is quite a school run to juggle. Harvey is severely disabled. He's blind, he's autistic, he has trouble walking. Who wouldn't need to ask for a bit of help under such circumstances?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here