This is a disaster tbh, as it means I will have to go out and actually TALK to women, with the usual outcome of them experiencing love-making of such finesse, they have multiple orgasms during the working day in anticipation of what is heading their way in the evening!
I've been avoiding it for ages, as they usually know sweet FA about footy, and because I'm a two-bagger
They're not 'banning' porn. You'll just have to make a phone call.
They're not 'banning' porn. You'll just have to make a phone call.
This isn't about porn however it's dressed up, it's about being able to control what information we have access to.
Emotive words and arguments will be used by those who are trying to bring this in, making the Daily Mail readers believe the BS and back it.
How long after that will certain non pornographic sites be put on the opt in/out list, independent news sites? bloggers? and so on.
Welcome to China.
Very good post.
Did you say that because your scared of him.... I few king am
Home internet is no problem. However I work away a couple of nights a week most weeks and am concerned that it will be standard for hotel wifi to have the filters on!
And they will no doubt log all the phone numbers used to make the 'opt-in' calls, creating an instant list of porn-surfers
So (I haven't paid much attention to this story) I assumed it was just the extreme stuff Cameron was going after with this campaign. Are you all saying he just wants to make it harder to access any porn sites?
Seems a little bit nanny state to me if that's the case. If you have kids, it's up to you to ensure they don't see things they shouldn't, otherwise surely it's up to you what you view? I'm not seeking to defend (say) paedophiles searching for images of children, clearly that should be stopped, but normal men- alright, "people"- looking for a bit of entertainment? Can't see what that's got to do with David Cameron. Or the Daily Mail. Where does it end??