Sorrel
Well-known member
I'm sure Chelsea would find a way to sell their shares to each other, for a loan guaranteed on those same shares.
But I would guess that if they have offered to put his shares in a blind trust - they have presumably accepted the principle that he has some controlling influence. That is - if Palace are arguing that, then they wouldn't have offered the blind trust option for UEFA to have rejected?They will continue to argue that Textor doesn’t have a controlling influence at board level - unfortunately this also means Textor could not unilaterally decide to put his own shares into a blind trust, even if the deadline to do so had’t passed since he has no decisive control over the Selhurst Park outfit.
Didn’t your fanbase fundraise the balance but CPFC2010 didn’t reimburse the fanbase?No, SJA got everything they were owed
But who will pay the going rate when they know the situation is desperate.Reading the whole article it sounds a bit iffy for Palace.
With the proviso that it’s kosher.
How long does it take to sell shares in a football club?
I guess one option would be for Textor to sell his shares to one of the other shareholders, with an agreement to buy them back at a specified price in a year’s time?
Textor would be absolutely mad to sell his shares in short order….he would almost certainly have to sell at a discount. However, he could possibly extort a high price from his fellow shareholders if they are desperate to play in Europe.
I'm pretty much on the same page at the moment.I've maintained throughout that Palace are in a worse predicament than most people realise. I think the only way they make the draw is if the other shareholders buy him out lock, stock and barrel - no caveats, no buybacks - and do it fast. I don't see any other way out of their bind, but am willing to be corrected.
The Palace investors aren’t in love with Croydon, it’s just a business with cladding.I may be completely wrong, but, it seems to me that the only Palace director who would be prepared to pay a high price for Textor shares, is the one director who can’t afford them.
The other 2 directors must see Palace as just a financial investment, they have no actual loyalty to the club, just their money.
He'd also presumably have to decide whether he wants to sell his shares in Palace or Lyon.I'm pretty much on the same page at the moment.
Plus, to add to all that, what is Textor's motive to sell anyway? I think we can all agree, even the Palace trolls, that he's not a Palace fan, he's a Palace investor. What possible motive does he have for offloading his shares, probably at a discount, just so a club that he no longer has any interest in can play in a potentially lucrative European tournament? What's in it for him? Warm fuzzy feelings? How is that a better financial move for Textor versus holding onto his stake and maybe selling it for market rates, or maybe even more if Palace have a good season next term?
So, ultimately, Palace's hopes rest on a capitalist deciding to do the right thing.
So, ultimately, Palace's hopes rest on a capitalist deciding to do the right thing.