[Football] If Palace can't play in the Europa League

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



seagull_si

Active member
Jul 8, 2011
255
Peacehaven
Please explain how we cheated in the FA Cup win. Its not our fault the officials decided it was not a red card, in the same way that it wasnt our fault that the penalty was the wrong decision, as Mitchell plays the ball
I have only just looked at the penalty decision as I see it referenced a lot, manly my you. It has always been my understanding that a foul can still be committed by a player even if they touch the ball. A quick ChatGPT search confirms this as well as giving an example of a sliding tackle where the player makes contact with the player after the ball, which in my opinion is what happened.
 




Berty23

Well-known member
Jun 26, 2012
4,299
I have only just looked at the penalty decision as I see it referenced a lot, manly my you. It has always been my understanding that a foul can still be committed by a player even if they touch the ball. A quick ChatGPT search confirms this as well as giving an example of a sliding tackle where the player makes contact with the player after the ball, which in my opinion is what happened.
Exactly. Isn’t this what happened vs Arsenal when lamptey gave a pen. Got ball but took out man who might have got it.
 














eaglesdan

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
294
I gave you a history lesson on Tuesday, now comes the English lesson:

CHEAT

verb
1.
act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage.

2.
avoid (something undesirable) by luck or skill.

So, in summary, Henderson's actions meet both points. Definitively, literally, absolutely - CHEATING.
But in that case every player in every team is a cheat

Any foul is cheating, diving is cheating, etc

What makes what Henderson did any worse than anything else that occurs on a football pitch? Not all fouls are penalised. Bernardo cheated when he dived for the penalty and Mitchell played the ball.

Thanks for the English lesson, but not sure you have fully thought through the way the definition is applied
 




Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,711
But in that case every player in every team is a cheat

Any foul is cheating, diving is cheating, etc

What makes what Henderson did any worse than anything else that occurs on a football pitch? Not all fouls are penalised. Bernardo cheated when he dived for the penalty and Mitchell played the ball.

Thanks for the English lesson, but not sure you have fully thought through the way the definition is applied
Look mate, quit with the whataboutery. The whole world could see Haaland was through on goal, he was going to get to the ball first. Henderson knew that so he intentionally handled the ball outside the area to prevent a goal - that's cheating.

There was nothing accidental about it, the keeper had time to decide what he was going to do. All the pundits agreed at h/t he should have seen red, and then it would have been a different game.

Bottom line - you won the FA Cup, Glasner sussed O'Reilly was not a left-back and targetted him in the first half, his tactics were spot on and you executed a defensive masterclass. Fair play to Palace, as beating Villa then Citeh is not easy.

But however much you don't like it, nothing will take away from the fact the officials made one of the biggest howlers in Cup Final history, your keeper cheated and should have been sent off. They say you need luck to win the Cup and Palace are living proof of that.
 




Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
16,959
Cumbria
Grauniad is a level above click-bait media, isn’t it?

So, if (if) UEFA have 'rejected' the blind trust option - what option are they expecting to come forward that they will 'accept'? Presumably the sale of his shares in one or other club?
 






lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969
NSC Patron
Jun 11, 2011
14,479
Worthing
Reading the whole article it sounds a bit iffy for Palace.


With the proviso that it’s kosher.

How long does it take to sell shares in a football club?
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
25,000
Brighton
Ooo, this just got tasty.
Yes indeed.

But like everyone else on this board, I'm confident
that our profoundly slippery and lucky northern neighbours will still get their prize.

However, reading this sort of stuff does make one chuckle fairly hard, even if it's just a case of enjoying the current discomfort of their support whilst knowing that the spawny eels will eventually slip their way into the draw in a week or so.

"Palace are in danger of paying a heavy price for their lack of foresight, leading to considerable frustration at Uefa’s lack of flexibility.

Uefa declined to comment, but sources at the European governing body stressed that given more than 300 clubs take part in its competitions each season, it has to ensure that the regulations are applied consistently." Guardian
 




Greenbag50

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2016
613
In theory, but we all know how it would really work. The trustees know they work for the owner, and if the owner were to casually remark to somebody at some business meeting what he thought the club should do? Well, it's entirely possible that that might somehow filter back to the trustees.

Or if one club made a transfer offer to the club in blind trust? I think the trustees will know what they are expected to do. (Note: no doubt a blind trust arrangement would actually include a transfer ban between the clubs for exactly this reason).
In theory, but we all know how it would really work. The trustees know they work for the owner, and if the owner were to casually remark to somebody at some business meeting what he thought the club should do? Well, it's entirely possible that that might somehow filter back to the trustees.

Or if one club made a transfer offer to the club in blind trust? I think the trustees will know what they are expected to do. (Note: no doubt a blind trust arrangement would actually include a transfer ban between the clubs for exactly this reason).
Sounds like they missed the boat on that;
Killer line in article is the one about 300 clubs in European competitions and consistency of rules have to be applied
 


Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
12,974
Reading the whole article it sounds a bit iffy for Palace.


With the proviso that it’s kosher.

How long does it take to sell shares in a football club?

As others have mentioned on this thread, Textor selling his shares in Palace won’t be straight forward. No one from the outside will want to buy the shares and become the latest shareholder while Parish retains control of the club.

One of the other current owners buying them seems more likely but how do they split up the voting rights Textor has without upsetting the status quo?

Doesn’t seem likely to be something that can be resolved in a couple of weeks.
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,809
So, if (if) UEFA have 'rejected' the blind trust option - what option are they expecting to come forward that they will 'accept'? Presumably the sale of his shares in one or other club?
They will continue to argue that Textor doesn’t have a controlling influence at board level - unfortunately this also means Textor could not unilaterally decide to put his own shares into a blind trust, even if the deadline to do so had’t passed since he has no decisive control over the Selhurst Park outfit.

The only option is probably for Textor to offload his shares in CP to other shareholders at a below market price.
 


US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
5,840
Cleveland, OH






US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
5,840
Cleveland, OH
They will continue to argue that Textor doesn’t have a controlling influence at board level - unfortunately this also means Textor could not unilaterally decide to put his shares into a blind trust, even if the deadline to do so had’t passed.

The only option is probably for Textor to offload his shares in CP .
Seems tricky according to the article:
Uefa rules make clear that any influence at two clubs in the same competition is prohibited. “No one may simultaneously be involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration, and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a Uefa club competition,” the regulations state.
My emphasis; any capacity whatsoever, not it's okay if you are below x%.

So yeah. Unload shares. But who wants to buy a chunk of a football club pretty much sight unseen? Any new investor would want to do their due diligence. Convincing the other owners to buy him out seems like the most reasonable way forward since they, presumably, know the books already.

But another thought, if Textor isn't involved in Palace anymore, why would he give a shit whether or not they play in Europe?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top