armchairclubber
Well-known member
Slander, is it?
Crikey.
People are trying to weaponize Starmer's failure to 'condemn' Israel. Who do you imagine these people might be? What's their game?
And, yeah, thanks for ignoring the entire rest of my argument. I want to see a swift end to the conflict and am saddened that I won't.
Arguing the toss about Starmer in this context is pathetic. You will see I haven't criticized Sunk in this context even those I loath him. In this context it is pathetic to use a failure to lead a Stop Israel campaign as a stick to beat a UK political leader. That's my point.
Bashing Starmer is this sort of petty-fogging nit picking that will get the 'ceasefire now!' movement nowhere. You need allies. Weaponizing Starmer's stance against Starmer is not going to encourage me to stand outside the US embassy waving a Palestinian flag.
We have had a lot of sensible discussion on this thread. It's a pity that people want to hijack it to promote their pro- or anti labour/tory bias.
It's a pity that people want to hijack it to promote their pro- or anti labour/tory bias.
This is very much the category I see you in I'm afraid. This is not a Starmer campaign thread, indeed I have found that inappropriate.
There is another one or more for that