Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Hamas/Gaza/Israel









Billy the Fish

Technocrat
Oct 18, 2005
17,515
Haywards Heath
Yes, asking for validation of sources and trying to find proof to substantiate claims is being factual and balanced, of course it is.

Accepting without question unsubstantiated 'claims' is buying into propaganda. While accusing others looking for proper evidence of ,downplaying' or 'denying' is the absolute opposite of being factual and balanced and evidence of bias and a clouded viewpoint.

Hence.my post.
Are we in some kind of weird parallel universe?

So the BBC, CNN, NYT, amongst others, are printing unsubstantiated claims.

But don't worry everyone, ignore those respected organisations because @Zeberdi has been on the Internet and found some proper evidence on a Palestinian only website called Electronic Infatada.

NYT investigation.

 
Last edited:


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,184
Are we in some kind of weird parallel universe?

So the BBC, CNN, NYT, amongst others, are printing unsubstantiated claims.

But don't worry everyone, ignore those respected organisations because @Zeberdi has been on the Internet and found some proper evidence on a Palestinian only website called Electronic Infatada.

NYT investigation.

It's a weird parallel universe where someone is personally attacked for asking for further evidence of something a news paper article posted as 'claims'. I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.

Whether the claims were true or not, my point was that the personal attacks and accusation on a poster asking for more information were way beyond the Pail and totally unnecessary. Surely the civilised and logical response was to provide the extra evidence requested?
 


Krafty

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2023
1,775
I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.
Yeah, I haven't seen @Zeberdi making any claims on this topic - although this statement can be proven wrong if anyone can provide any evidence showing these claims.

I thought the Electronic Intifada was posted to provide another perspective from the Palestinian side. I have read some of their articles and found them very insightful, albeit it is up to the reader to decide their reliability - likewise with BBC articles, etc.
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,184
Yeah, I haven't seen @Zeberdi making any claims on this topic - although this statement can be proven wrong if anyone can provide any evidence showing these claims.

I thought the Electronic Intifada was posted to provide another perspective from the Palestinian side. I have read some of their articles and found them very insightful, albeit it is up to the reader to decide their reliability - likewise with BBC articles, etc.
I expect you'll get some laughing emojis instead of evidence of deberdi supposed claims.

Anyway as I said these posters are best ignored as they don't add much to the discussion.
 


Billy the Fish

Technocrat
Oct 18, 2005
17,515
Haywards Heath
It's a weird parallel universe where someone is personally attacked for asking for further evidence of something a news paper article posted as 'claims'. I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.

Whether the claims were true or not, my point was that the personal attacks and accusation on a poster asking for more information were way beyond the Pail and totally unnecessary. Surely the civilised and logical response was to provide the extra evidence requested?
Please explain what you mean by extra evidence?
 


Krafty

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2023
1,775
I expect you'll get some laughing emojis instead of evidence of deberdi supposed claims.

Anyway as I said these posters are best ignored as they don't add much to the discussion.
Yes, the laughing (mocking) emojis from @aolstudios and @cjd seem to now be commonplace on (what I thought was intended to be) a serious thread.

I do have suspicions that both accounts are being controlled by the same user.
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,900
Back in Sussex
Yes, the laughing (mocking) emojis from @aolstudios and @cjd seem to now be commonplace on (what I thought was intended to be) a serious thread.

I do have suspicions that both accounts are being controlled by the same user.
I've not really paid attention to use of emojis, but if I see people using laughing emojis in a way I determine is mocking or similar, then I will act as per my earlier warning.

Again: no apologies/reasons/appeals will be listened to.

Act in good faith if you wish to retain access to this thread, and similar on NSC.
 








Greenbag50

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2016
387
Did you read the article you linked?

Either way, you can't hold kids responsible for the Hamas attacks.

I was about to ban at least one person from this thread, but I'll issue a final warning. There won't be any more. Next time people will be banned, permanently, from this thread.

I don't care what "side" you are on, please debate the subject. If you attack other posters directly then you will be removed from this thread and, potentially, the site completely.

No subsequent apologies/appeals/grovels/"What about..."s will be listened to.
I think that is a very reasonable position.
As the OP, if I didn’t start this thread, someone else would have.
I think to have the freedom to debate these very sensitive geo-political subjects is something we should be proud of being able to do in the UK freely, without state or Government interference or control.
Mindful of some of the countries/ cultures we are discussing, the citizens of these countries may not be afforded this right and are prosecuted for it, without any rule of law in attendance.
We should be thankful we live in such a country where freedom of speech is protected and we should, as a people be grateful we live in such a country where this is possible. Currently.
 




Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,978
Are we in some kind of weird parallel universe?

So the BBC, CNN, NYT, amongst others, are printing unsubstantiated claims.

But don't worry everyone, ignore those respected organisations because @Zeberdi has been on the Internet and found some proper evidence on a Palestinian only website called Electronic Infatada.

NYT investigation.

On the contrary, I simply highlighted that there seems to be a distinct lack of evidence for some of the claims. EI is not a ‘Palestinian only’ website in the sense it is aimed at Palestinians, it’s audience is broad, it is a fact finding organisation that tried to provide an objective Palestinian perspective on issues where that perspective is largely ignored - it has been used by major news organisations as a source and has won awards for it’s commitment to human rights.

This is their website

As for other MSM sources - I did not say they should be ‘ignored’ or debunked - I have simply said their access to source material has been largely controlled and provided by the Israeli Government and interviews with inherently biased witnesses... and I also agreed there were probably incidences of sexual violence. The claim made by Israel however that this was a systematic tool of terror perpetrated by Hamas on 7th October may possibly be open to question so needs a full independent inquiry.

I posted links and quotes from Npr and Reuters News agencies, both highly respected in global news media, less hyperbolic or morally outraged in their tone of reporting current affairs than many news sources and both independent news agencies - they said they could not verify all the accounts. I detailed the problematic evidentiary issues raised both by Israel and the NYT and other News outlets too so not just EI..

As I also quoted from the Reuters link above, Israel has said they are not willing to work with the UN commission of inquiry because they say “it is biased” (presumably because they are concurrently investigating Israel for genocide). A UN ‘serious and impartial investigation’ ( that Hamas is calling for) might undermine any systemic rape narratives that can help Israel revitalise demonisation of Hamas as a justification of the war in Gaza - at a time when international resistance to Israel’s destruction of Gaza and the mass indiscriminate killing of thousands of children and women is becoming increasingly problematic for Netanyahu’s leadership and agenda in Gaza.

Because of that potential conflict of interest, the claims Israel is making need to be critically analysed from all sides and any outcome based on a broad range of independent resources.

 
Last edited:




sydney

tinky ****in winky
Jul 11, 2003
17,777
town full of eejits
I was about to ban at least one person from this thread, but I'll issue a final warning. There won't be any more. Next time people will be banned, permanently, from this thread.

I don't care what "side" you are on, please debate the subject. If you attack other posters directly then you will be removed from this thread and, potentially, the site completely.

No subsequent apologies/appeals/grovels/"What about..."s will be listened to.
give us a clue...?
 




Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,978
Please explain what you mean by extra evidence?

It's a weird parallel universe where someone is personally attacked for asking for further evidence of something a news paper article posted as 'claims'. I may have missed zeberdi drawing any kind of conclusion about this stuff but from what I saw he was simply asking for more information.
Yes - exactly this. Very much in line with what Volker Turk, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights has also stated in a press conference in December:

‘Independent investigation needed

Meanwhile, Turk highlighted that Israel itself had not responded to his repeated requests for access to investigate the allegations independently.

"We take the allegations extremely seriously," he said, but "you need to go into quite some detailed examination of whether it's premeditated, whether it was widespread, systematic".

"I'm not in a position to confirm this."

He stressed that for weeks he had "asked the Israeli authorities... to deploy a team, my team, to monitor, document, investigate the issues of the horrific attacks on Israelis".

"I've repeated this call and I hope it will be heard but so far, I haven't received a response."

Even if access is denied, Turk said that "we will find other ways and means to talk to whoever we need to talk to … Atrocious forms of sexual violence need to be thoroughly investigated, and we need to make sure that justice is served," he said.

"That's what we owe the victims."’


Edit - A far left perspective

And a Jewish independent non-profit on information gathering before the IDF subsequently claimed to have evidence of systematic rape

 
Last edited:


Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
70,587
Yes - exactly this. Very much in line with what Volker Turk, the United Nations high commissioner for human rights has also stated in a press conference in December:

‘Independent investigation needed

Meanwhile, Turk highlighted that Israel itself had not responded to his repeated requests for access to investigate the allegations independently.

"We take the allegations extremely seriously," he said, but "you need to go into quite some detailed examination of whether it's premeditated, whether it was widespread, systematic".

"I'm not in a position to confirm this."

He stressed that for weeks he had "asked the Israeli authorities... to deploy a team, my team, to monitor, document, investigate the issues of the horrific attacks on Israelis".

"I've repeated this call and I hope it will be heard but so far, I haven't received a response."

Even if access is denied, Turk said that "we will find other ways and means to talk to whoever we need to talk to … Atrocious forms of sexual violence need to be thoroughly investigated, and we need to make sure that justice is served," he said.

"That's what we owe the victims."’


Edit - A far left perspective

And a Jewish independent non-profit on information gathering before the IDF subsequently claimed to have evidence of systematic rape

Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? I mean, really? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what should be blatantly manipulative red flags. And, to clarify, this is not an 'ad hominem' attack - to use his favourite phrase - on the poster in question, it's an attack on the entity he is posting on behalf of
 
Last edited:




aolstudios

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2011
4,630
brighton
Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? I mean, really? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what should be blatantly manipulative red flags. And, to clarify, this is not an 'ad hominem' attack - to use his favourite phrase - on the poster in question, it's an attack on the entity he is posting on behalf of
You're far from alone in this observation, @Tom Hark Preston Park
 


Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
13,860
Almería
Sorry @Bozza and mods if this besmirches your edict for the thread. But this guy does not post on this thread in the manner of a normal poster on this site. This is something else. Half a dozen links and a thousand word treatise every time he posts? We're clearly being steered in a particular direction by a particular entity. Please feel free to ban me from this thread for pointing out what are blatantly manipulative red flags

You mean he gives his opinion and provides sources to back it up?

Is that worse than the laughing emojis favoured by other posters?

To be honest, I prefer a post backed up by evidence to spurious claims based on nothing but bias, half-truth and hearsay.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here