Goodwin gets another year, plus the rest of the contract news for 2005...

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,458
Brighton
Contract talks took place at the County Ground, Hove on Tuesday 14 September and Sussex County Cricket Club would like to release the following information:

Murray Goodwin has been offered a new one-year contract, keeping him with the Club until the end of 2005.

New contracts have been offered to Mark Davis, Jason Lewry, Carl Hopkinson, Michael Yardy, Chris Nash and Neil Turk. Nash and Turk are graduates from the Sussex Academy.

Two players were not offered contracts for 2005; Tony Cottey and Kevin Innes.

Extensions have been offered to Richard Montgomerie, Robin Martin-Jenkins, Mushtaq Ahmed, Luke Wright and Tim Ambrose.

Sean Heather has been offered three-month extended trial with SCCC from April – June 2005. Sean has come through the Sussex League, playing for Eastbourne and has represented the Second XI.

Peter Moores, Director of Cricket, said:
“It is very sad that Tony will not be playing for the Club in 2005. He has been a fantastic servant of the Club and his contribution both on and off the field has been an integral part of the Club’s recent successes.

“It is a shame for us to bid farewell to Kevin. He is an extremely talented cricketer whose commitment to the Club has always been 100%. Kevin has had limited opportunities at 1st XI level this year and we wish him every success in the future.

“We are delighted to be able to offer Murray a new one-year contract. His record for Sussex is outstanding and we hope he will agree to commit his future to the Club.

“Chris Nash and Neil Turk have both been offered terms for 2005. Both were products of the Sussex youth system and more recently the ECB Sussex Academy. It is a testament to the quality of our coaching system and youth structure that these two fine Sussex-bred cricketers have made it to the County squad.”
 




CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,320
Hmmmm, Goodwin hasn't really set the Championship alight this year. There must be another English batsman coming in?
 






CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,320
Good point, Buck. He was in the Argus last week going on about the Kolpak thing so I'd have thought it would be that actually. We could look to bring another overseas batsman in. Dippenaar it is then.
 




Uncle Buck

Ghost Writer
Jul 7, 2003
28,075
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
Good point, Buck. He was in the Argus last week going on about the Kolpak thing so I'd have thought it would be that actually. We could look to bring another overseas batsman in. Dippenaar it is then.

Also if we have got him under the Kolpak agreement, then we will be paying him less than as an overseas player. Also he must be due to get residency soon, he has been playing for us for a while now.
 


Trigger

Well-known member
Jul 4, 2003
40,458
Brighton
Goodwin was set to join Derbyshire under the Kolpak ruling before we offered him a new 1 year deal so i presume he's staying under the Kolpak?...
 


Uncle Buck

Ghost Writer
Jul 7, 2003
28,075
Trigger said:
Goodwin was set to join Derbyshire under the Kolpak ruling before we offered him a new 1 year deal so i presume he's staying under the Kolpak?...

Which means we can get in an overseas middle order player. So you are then looking at either a South African, Indian, Pakistan or Windies player as the Aussies and Bangladesh are over here next year.
 








CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,320
Oooh, Bravo would be schweet as I reckon. Of course Sarwan would be nice but Bravo looks like a well exciting player.
 








Martlet

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2003
695
you're all off the mark I'm afraid - there's only one overseas player next year, and that'll be bowling bowling mushy.

Shabash
 






Martlet

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2003
695
Uncle Buck said:
The counties voted to keep it as 2 overseas players, although Sussex were one of those against this.


wasn't all the hassle at the end of last season about being able to give Mushy a two-year contract, but not Murray (because it was only 1 o/s player in 2005), and Murray wanting a 2 yr deal?

sorry chaps - I must have missed yet another ECB pronouncement!
 


Uncle Buck

Ghost Writer
Jul 7, 2003
28,075
Martlet said:
wasn't all the hassle at the end of last season about being able to give Mushy a two-year contract, but not Murray (because it was only 1 o/s player in 2005), and Murray wanting a 2 yr deal?

sorry chaps - I must have missed yet another ECB pronouncement!

Yep you are correct, but they then changed their minds this year and kept it as 2 overseas players.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top