Good luck Ray Parlour - gulp!

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Wozza

Custom title
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
25,075
Minteh Wonderland
STAR'S EX IN LANDMARK CASE

The ex-wife of Premiership footballer Ray Parlour will today learn whether she has won her claim for more than a third of his future income.

The outcome of the case could have major implications for other divorce settlements.

Karen Parlour was earlier awarded two mortgage-free houses worth more than £1m, a £250,000 lump sum and £250,00 a year.

However, the mother-of-three's lawyers told the Court of Appeal that was not enough.

They argued his £1.2m a year salary should, in principle, be split 50-50 to reflect her input on the marriage.

This was because she rescued him from the drinking culture which existed at Arsenal before Arsene Wenger took over as manager.

High Court Family Division judge Mr Justice Bennett awarded Mrs Parlour £250,000 annual maintenance in January.

He ruled her ex-husband's offer of £120,000 did not reflect the major part she played in persuading him to "grow up".

Mrs Parlour, 33, has accepted that, because her relationship with the premiership star lasted only seven years, she could not claim the full 50%.

But the former optician's assistant from Romford, Essex, said she was entitled to around £440,000 a year from his £1.2m income.

Her lawyer said this was because the earning capacity he developed with her support during their marriage was a "matrimonial resource".

Maintenance is at present awarded on the basis of a spouse's "reasonable needs" rather than the equal share principle that applies to division of matrimonial assets.
 




JJ McClure

Go Jags
Jul 7, 2003
11,293
Hassocks
You've gotta be having a laugh. Half his future earnings for not even being married to him anymore. Greedy bitch.
 




Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
She's lucky to be getting any maintenance at all.

When my ex ran off with another woman I got £15 a week for my daughter and that was it. (My son was already working; his contribution to the housekeeping was taken into consideration)

I had to pay the mortgage solely for another three years before my daughter left school and then the house was 50/50.

Settle for what you have. It's more than a lot of wives get.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,463
what a greedy cow. It'll be intresting to see if he works some creative contract whereby he appears to play for free. I would, just to piss her off.
 






Braders

Abi Fletchers Gimpboy
Jul 15, 2003
29,224
Brighton, United Kingdom
SAVE RAY
and don't let Karen win:clap:
 


GUNTER

New member
Jul 9, 2003
4,373
Brighton
STAR'S EX WINS APPEAL

The ex-wife of Premiership footballer Ray Parlour has won her claim for more than a third of his future income of £1.2m a year.

The Appeal Court ruling could have major implications for other divorce settlements.


Mother-of-three Karen Parlour said afterwards she was "very relieved at the outcome of the appeal and the settlement agreed".

Mrs Parlour, 33, had been receiving £250,000 a year personal maintenance from her ex-husband following their divorce in 2002.

That will now be increased to £406,500 for the next four years. The figure will be reviewed at the end of this period.

The award is in addition to two mortgage-free houses worth more than £1m and a £250,000 lump sum.

Mr Parlour, 31, also pays £12,500 a year for each of their children, aged eight, six and four.

The Arsenal midfielder had originally offered to pay Mrs Parlour £120,000 a year.

Three judges had been asked to rule that, in principle, the post-divorce income of a high-earning spouse should be split 50-50, the same way as other matrimonial assets.

This was to reflect the vital input of the other partner to the marriage.

Mrs Parlour accepted that because her relationship with the footballer lasted only seven years, she could not claim the full 50%.

Lawyers representing Mrs Parlour, a former optician's assistant from Romford, Essex, had rescued her husband's career by stopping him drinking excesively.

Without her contribution to the marriage and family's life, they argued, he would not have been so successful.

Until now maintenance has been awarded on the basis of a spouse's "reasonable needs" rather than the equal share principle that applies to division of matrimonial assets.
 
Last edited:




CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,325
f*** SAKE.

THat is really gonna f*** some people up. What a ridiculous precedent to set. Imagine the amount of men and women that are going to look to claim after divorces now.

A BIG victory for divorce lawyers.
 


Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
ChapmansThe Saviour said:


A BIG victory for divorce lawyers.

They are the only winners in divorces.
 






SK1NT

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2003
8,766
Thames Ditton
women, typical money grabbing wenches, when a marriage ends! whats the worst is when the women cheats and causes the break up and still gets half :nono:
 




Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
brighton_b0y said:
women, typical money grabbing wenches, when a marriage ends! whats the worst is when the women cheats and causes the break up and still gets half :nono:

Careful you are on dodgy ground there.

I lost a hell of a lot when he cheated. :angry:

Mind you he did me a big favour in the long run because I met Ned 2 years later. :angel:
 






Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,531
Lancing
My advice to all men ever thinking of marrying - DON'T !. And do not even consider having any children or you are writing your own bankruptcy petition if/when things go wrong as the law is 95% in favour of married women without children and 100% in favour of married women with children.
 


pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,660
West, West, West Sussex
Yorkie said:
Careful you are on dodgy ground there.

I lost a hell of a lot when he cheated. :angry:

Abso-bloody-lutely Yorkie

Mrs Pasty's ex hubby left her and set up home with a floozy, and simply because she started another relationship (with me) about a year later, WE have ended up having to pay HIM £25,000 so Mrs Pasty can remain in the home with her daughter.

At one point in the proceedings, the judge (female unbelievably) even suggested Mrs Pasty and daughter should move out so he could sell the house, and they could move in with me - into a tiny two bedroom (slightly bachelorised) first floor flat. This is at the same time as Mrs Pasty was undergoing chemo-therapy for breast cancer.
 
Last edited:


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
Marrage is the only way of getting the miniscule paternal rights at the moment GG.

Oh and i'm very carefull/reluctant to settle down.
 




saltash seagull

New member
Mar 1, 2004
4,480
cornwall
this is unbelivable! half of wat you get when you split is 1 thing but to give her such a large chunk of future earnings is outrageous
 


CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,325
looney said:
Marrage is the only way of getting the miniscule paternal rights at the moment GG.

Oh and i'm very carefull/reluctant to settle down.

Stop making excuses, you're ugly as sin and you know it.


:angel:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top