Dick Knight betting scam on front page of Argus...........

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Ernest

Stupid IDIOT
Nov 8, 2003
42,758
LOONEY BIN
The Large One said:
It ought to be be listed in the most recently published club accounts... :rolleyes:

As you've never had confidence in Dick Knight anyway Ernest, and refuse to do so, this episode is hardly going to affect your views. So what are you moaning about? Your sanctimonious head-shaking every time Dick Knight or Martin Perry spoke at the recent fans' forum did have a few people around you giggling into their hands like errant schoolchildren. It was quite funny.

:)

And I suppose you were splitting your sides laughing at Dick Shites totally unfunny , name dropping , bull shitting gag ???
 










3gulls

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
2,403
The Auditor said:
The fraud squad were mentioned in one of the newspaper bits so the answer is probably yes

If that is the case, how can DK not stand down as Chairman of the Club? We don't need him being a liability at this critical time. :nono:
 




Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,427
West Sussex
I smell something fishy and I'm not talking about Baldricks apple crumble.

Why the haste to criticise Dick Knight when the facts are still not known? :angry:
 




3gulls

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
2,403
Titanic said:
I smell something fishy and I'm not talking about Baldricks apple crumble.

Why the haste to criticise Dick Knight when the facts are still not known? :angry:

The facts that are known are; our Chairman was untill recently, Chairman of a company under police investigation for fraud. We are currently seeking permission to build a new football stadium and a public enquiry about it is in progress. Upon receipt of approval, funding is dependant upon handouts from various charities and funds as well as financial institutions and backers. The development partners are the local authority and an education establishment. Now how does that look to you? :nono:
 






3gulls

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
2,403
Titanic said:
Oh right... so he MUST be guilty then ?

Where does it say that he is guilty? It is bad enough that he and a former Director are associated with such an affair at a time when the whole club need to be whiter than white.

For christ sake, everyone throws a moody about not getting Falmer when a few idiots get involved in a fight in the town centre. This is far worse.
 


It's incredible, isn't it, that no one connected with this sad affair, whether it be the Sporting Options punters, Betfair, any other creditors of SO, anyone connected with Griffiths, in fact, NO ONE, has levelled any accusations whatsoever against the conduct of Dick Knight.

Dick Knight has put out a statement defining his links with SO which no party involved in this affair has contradicted.

Yet the one place where people are building wild supposition upon muckraking supposition is on NSC.

You would think that Albion fans should be the one part of the Sussex community that Dick Knight could turn to get some backing and support in what those close to him have been honest enough to admit has been an embarrassing episode.

After all the things that Dick Knight has done for the fans of this club over the last decade :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:

SAD SAD SAD SAD
 
Last edited:




As LI says, some of the arguments being put forward on NSC are unbelievable.

It's like saying that any punter who put money on horses through Sporting Odds is an idiot and they should have their credit cards confiscated because they obviously can't be trusted to manage their money properly.
 


b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,193
... good post, LI, but... IF fraud is proved, then, by association, Dick Knights reputation will suffer, whether you or I like it or not... and, by extension, the club's efforts to obtain funds for Falmer will be hampered...

Not only that, but any monies supplied to the club by KG may have to be repaid to meet SO's debts...

I know we don't know the full facts, but this MAY turn out to be a big problem for the club, and I am NOT anti-DK... just saying I'm worried, that's all...

Or am I missing something here?...
 


3gulls

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
2,403
Lord Bracknell said:
As LI says, some of the arguments being put forward on NSC are unbelievable.

It's like saying that any punter who put money on horses through Sporting Odds is an idiot and they should have their credit cards confiscated because they obviously can't be trusted to manage their money properly.

What about those who went through Sporting Options as well! :rolleyes:
 




aftershavedave

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
7,243
as 10cc say, not in hove
my problem with this whole affair is (notwithstandiung that it could f*** up our funding) is the sanctimonious attitude by some people on here.

criticise dick knight or the board and instant leper status.

yet the plain facts that this is bloody fishy are plainly ignored by some of the yes-sayers..that's my problem
 


I'm sorry you feel got at. But please put yourself in Dick Knight's position and imagine him reading this thread with his integrity being impugned repeatedly in fact-less, hyped-up scenarios. Does he really deserve that from us?

We can do much better than this - we have to stick together and stay united.
 


dougdeep

New member
May 9, 2004
37,732
SUNNY SEAFORD
London Irish said:
I'm sorry you feel got at. But please put yourself in Dick Knight's position and imagine him reading this thread with his integrity being impugned repeatedly in fact-less, hyped-up scenarios. Does he really deserve that from us?

We can do much better than this - we have to stick together and stay united.

You are right again.(doesn't it get boring)
 


spidey

New member
Jun 17, 2004
474
B Hill
To be fair, and i'm not saying I agree with some of the 'doom-mongers', he was, until earlier this year, Chairman of SO.
I'm sure he will found to be in the clear, but he will be investigated.
 




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Where he has gone wrong is trying to justify his actions to the media, thats the dregs of society who write what they think you were saying not what you actually said, and thus exposing himself to more critisiscm. He would have done better to have said ' the firm is being investigated and until the result of this investigation is forthcoming I have no comment to make'.

Incidentally on this issue I believe it will be proved that he was not guilty of any wrong doing.

I still know which of the two Knights I would rather see go!!
 


3gulls

Banned
Jul 26, 2004
2,403
Recently posted by "Insider":

"To allay fans’ fears, the club has clarified the position further:

Kevin Griffiths has resigned from the Board, but the bulk of the money he put into the club is in share capital and therefore cannot be removed.

The club apologises that Mr Griffiths’s name was not removed from the list of directors in today’s match programme due to an editorial admin error."

It would be interesting to know when Companies House received his 288b! ???
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top