[Albion] Cole Palmer on loan?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Paris

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2010
4,090
13th district
Surely it's a win, win situation for Pep and City. We take Cole Palmer either permanently or on loan, who if fit will boost the possibility of us taking points off of City's supposed title/top four rivals. While not being allowed to play at either the Etihad or Amex against Man City.
 


Justice

Dangerous Idiot
Jun 21, 2012
19,045
Born In Shoreham
Surely it's a win, win situation for Pep and City. We take Cole Palmer either permanently or on loan, who if fit will boost the possibility of us taking points off of City's supposed title/top four rivals. While not being allowed to play at either the Etihad or Amex against Man City.
Are you seriously suggesting spend £40m on a player only for him not to play against the best side in the league?
 


b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,182
Buy him, he can then play against any club.
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,973
Gloucester
Surely it's a win, win situation for Pep and City. We take Cole Palmer either permanently or on loan, who if fit will boost the possibility of us taking points off of City's supposed title/top four rivals. While not being allowed to play at either the Etihad or Amex against Man City.
I dont think that stipulation would be valid if he was sold permanently.
 




Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
21,791
Brighton
I still can’t understand for the life of me, why Citeh would be considering selling him. Surely - they have decided to keep him but I’ve not seen that confirmed.
 










Colonel Mustard

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2023
2,139
I would have gone all out to get him weeks ago, when these stories started. Both Lewis and Palmer were excellent when they appeared at the Amex. I hope the Chelsea story is wrong. He’ll get nothing like the game time we would give him, and I hope Pep would see that he would develop better under RDZ than in the chaos of Chelsea.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,401
Uffern
I'm not saying that we'll get him but if the fella wants more game time, why on earth would he go to Chelsea? I know they pay well but he's not going to be on the poverty line at the moment
 






Doonhamer7

Well-known member
Jun 17, 2016
1,295
Surely it's a win, win situation for Pep and City. We take Cole Palmer either permanently or on loan, who if fit will boost the possibility of us taking points off of City's supposed title/top four rivals. While not being allowed to play at either the Etihad or Amex against Man City.
That’s against League rules for permanent transfer
 


DarrenFreemansPerm

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Sep 28, 2010
17,339
Shoreham
I’d be interested if it’s a permanent, but absolutely not on loan. If teams like Chelsea and City Group want their players developing in the Premier League then they should put them in their own team.
 






Mancgull

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2011
4,884
Astley, Manchester
Would normally say no if it was a loan, but with Enciso being out for up to half the season wouldn’t a loan be a reasonable option?
I expect a loan to us would be preferable to City than a move to a potential top 4 competitor in Chelsea ( being realistic here about our chances this season).
Gives us more flexibility than a £30m move for Adli from Leverkusen.
 












Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top