Stop all this negative, which is mostly my fault.
What I suggest is we had a bit more PR on the merits of the Falmer Stadium, .eg.
1) Who is the architect?
2) What is the roof made of?
if you know the answer the PR must have worked.
There is no argument against development in an area with Listed Buildings.
The argument is that the new development should be complimentary (something like that; not cheapen the neighbourhood) i.e. my interpretation is the design needs to be of the same standard.
I would like to think the stadium should be the Listed Stadium of the future. Maybe, I am dreaming that it is more that a prefab with fancy bits?
What I suggest is we had a bit more PR on the merits of the Falmer Stadium, .eg.
1) Who is the architect?
2) What is the roof made of?
if you know the answer the PR must have worked.
There is no argument against development in an area with Listed Buildings.
The argument is that the new development should be complimentary (something like that; not cheapen the neighbourhood) i.e. my interpretation is the design needs to be of the same standard.
I would like to think the stadium should be the Listed Stadium of the future. Maybe, I am dreaming that it is more that a prefab with fancy bits?