hybrid_x
Banned
- Jun 28, 2011
- 2,225
Never really understood this 'but it contains eyes / gentials / guts / feet' etc viewpoint for cheap bits of meat like nuggets and sausages. Would you rather we threw those bits of the animal away and wasted them? Because it seems to me that it's fairer to the animal to make sure we eat all of it, it has died for us to eat it after all. Personally I think It's much worse that some people buy a chicken to roast and only eat the breast. If I had to die so somebody could eat me I'd be pretty pissed off if they only ate my arm.
I buy free range chicken because I can afford to, but a single Mum with four kids can't, so it's good that people like that still have the opportunity to eat chicken and other cheap meat, even if it is at a lower grade. So maybe you should think about it a little more before you start branding people idiots.
maybe you should think a bit more about the following fact....
Hormone injected and badly treated inbred chicken that are mashed up and covered in chemicals, flavorings, and colours is not "low grade chicken" - it is Toxic......it is scientifically better to have a glass of water for dinner than eat that. It is not food, it is toxic chemicals..........hence, people who know this, and still feel ok to buy it, and eat it, are, in my opinion, idiots.
To say you are happy to eat liquidized spines, balls, prostrated due to waste is nonsense, because if you cared about waste you wouldnt eat meat at all due to the amount of grain that is wasted on livestock (that could feed the whole of africa).
your reply falls down in so many places.