Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Chelsea
- Thread starter Simster
- Start date
agreed Watford, like Man U . . .I dont think Chelsea have many local fans who support regularly, at a guess Id say a home gate is 60+% corporate and trendys 
Tooting Gull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 11,033
Simster, I agree totally with your sentiments about Chelsea, Bates has f***ed it up financially and got out of jail, thay are a loathsome club. But I wouldn't throw in the towel just yet.
I think you'll find that as we speak various papers are detailing their Moscow staff to spend the next couple of months trying to get something on Abramovich. Many of his closest business and political associates are either currently under questioning or in exile under the threat of fraud and corruption charges. He himself had an investigation dropped about 10 years ago into a hijacked train load of diesel fuel. You never know, the biggest bit of this Chelsea story may be yet to come.
I think you'll find that as we speak various papers are detailing their Moscow staff to spend the next couple of months trying to get something on Abramovich. Many of his closest business and political associates are either currently under questioning or in exile under the threat of fraud and corruption charges. He himself had an investigation dropped about 10 years ago into a hijacked train load of diesel fuel. You never know, the biggest bit of this Chelsea story may be yet to come.
Dandyman
In London village.
and Chelsea always have been and always will be bigger than Tottenham bloody Hotspur although theyll never be better than the Gooners!
You're having a laugh are n't you ? Spurs have done bugger all for most of the last 10 years and still get 35,000 for most games. I can remember going to Stamford Bridge in the early 90's for Spurs v. Chelsea and there being 10,000 Spurs in a crowd of 18,000. Chelsea are bigger phonies than the Arse, with even more vile supporters.
You're having a laugh are n't you ? Spurs have done bugger all for most of the last 10 years and still get 35,000 for most games. I can remember going to Stamford Bridge in the early 90's for Spurs v. Chelsea and there being 10,000 Spurs in a crowd of 18,000. Chelsea are bigger phonies than the Arse, with even more vile supporters.
- Thread starter
- #25
Indeed Dandyman. Where has all this "Chelsea are bigger than Spuzz" bollocks come from? We all know they got 83,000 in the days when you pissed down the leg of the bloke standing in front of you, but Cardiff got 50,000 against Real Madrid in the fifties and we all know how small time they are.
dandy, Spurs are scum. They havent done anything for ages but the odd FA cup win, decent stad, religous ties, and great players (gazza, lineker, waddle, etc) all help keep the fans reasonably appy. When Chelsea were getting nothing thats cos:-
1, They hadnt won anything for 20 years apart from the Zenith Data Systems cup.
2, They had scumbag fans that just wanted a fight.
3, They had a shit ground.
4, They were in the 2nd division.
5, shit squad.
Theres no comparison here to be made.
1, They hadnt won anything for 20 years apart from the Zenith Data Systems cup.
2, They had scumbag fans that just wanted a fight.
3, They had a shit ground.
4, They were in the 2nd division.
5, shit squad.
Theres no comparison here to be made.
User removed 4
New member
this is probably a record for dredging up an old thread ut im bored at work and going through old threads, well ill grant you we have a lot of johnny come lately fans at chelsea but there is so much shit talked about our support , since when have battersea,putney,clapham.streatham,tooting,hammersmith,large swathes of lambeth been outer london sprawls ??
User removed 4
New member
exactly mate , at a guess, i bet youve never f***ing beenagreed Watford, like Man U . . .I dont think Chelsea have many local fans who support regularly, at a guess Id say a home gate is 60+% corporate and trendys
turienzo's lovechild
New member
- Oct 25, 2003
- 23,964
why on EARTH was this bounced?!
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 30,619
This should settle this debate:
Champions League, 18 Sep 07. Chelsea 1-1 Rosenborg. Att.24,973
2 days later:
UEFA Cup, 20 Sep 07. Spurs 6-1 Anorthosis Famagusta. Att. 35,780.
Champions League, 18 Sep 07. Chelsea 1-1 Rosenborg. Att.24,973
2 days later:
UEFA Cup, 20 Sep 07. Spurs 6-1 Anorthosis Famagusta. Att. 35,780.
Yeah, but when you have no chance of winning the league or getting near the Champions league then a cup that eventually has a final between a load of bigots from Russia and a load of bigots from Scotland is pretty much the highlight of your season.
Perry Milkins
Just a quiet guy.
What was the attendance for the Mansfield game?
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
Chelsea fans...
This was an interesting opener in Ian Wright's 'column' (in The Sun) the other day. Sums them up, really...
.
This was an interesting opener in Ian Wright's 'column' (in The Sun) the other day. Sums them up, really...
.
Last edited:
User removed 4
New member
no it sums the johnny come latelys up, not all of usChelsea fans...
This was an interesting opener in Ian Wright's 'column' (in The Sun) the other day. Sums them up, really...
.
sten_super
Brain Surgeon
Eh? Roman has made it pretty clear that the European Cup was the be-all and end-all for Chelski, exactly the same as the UEFA Cup was for Spurs.
Both games were midweek.
Both games were on TV.
Both games were games that the teams would have expected to win.
I don't really see the difference.
Do be honest I was just on a wind up.
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
European football is still a novelty for Spurs fans.
It was just A N Other Euro match for the Chelsea c.unts.
sten_super
Brain Surgeon
D'oh! I thought something didn't quite add up.
A novelty it may be, but against a shithouse Cypriot team?
As it was, those Chelsea c.unts missed Joses last game in charge!
User removed 4
New member
so when the albion were getting 20,000 plus in the 80,s against 6000 ish now , the majority were glory hunting johnny come latelys ?