according to teamtalk.com. Any truth in this?
J Johnners New member Jun 27, 2004 43 burgess hill Aug 2, 2006 #1 according to teamtalk.com. Any truth in this?
D Da Man Clay T'Blades Dec 16, 2004 16,309 Aug 2, 2006 #2 Fixtures. Well its kilmarnock he is on trial with.
F FalmerforAll!** NSC's Most Intelligent Oct 26, 2005 8,424 Burgess Hill Aug 2, 2006 #3 f. . . . oh never mind
RM-Taylor He's Magic.... You Know NSC Patron Jan 7, 2006 15,430 Aug 2, 2006 #4 It says on the TeamTalk page that Mark McGhee was set to offer him a short-term deal before they came in for him, is this true Last edited: Aug 2, 2006
It says on the TeamTalk page that Mark McGhee was set to offer him a short-term deal before they came in for him, is this true
L London Irish Well-known member Nov 25, 2003 23,443 Trapped inside the Project for the New American Ce Aug 2, 2006 #6 Yes, we wanted him short-term. Obviously it's the job of his agent to get him a far longer deal than that.
Yes, we wanted him short-term. Obviously it's the job of his agent to get him a far longer deal than that.
jonny.rainbow Well-known member Oct 29, 2005 6,989 Aug 2, 2006 #7 I was impressed with him but can't really judge as I didn't see the MK Dons game. It's possible he is no better than Hart or Reid and therefore not worth taking the risk on.
I was impressed with him but can't really judge as I didn't see the MK Dons game. It's possible he is no better than Hart or Reid and therefore not worth taking the risk on.
S Superseagull Well-known member Jul 8, 2003 2,132 Aug 3, 2006 #8 I suppose if missing out on Brittain means we can afford a decent midfielder and striker then that i think is a price worth paying. However I think we will end up getting none of these by the time of the first game. Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
I suppose if missing out on Brittain means we can afford a decent midfielder and striker then that i think is a price worth paying. However I think we will end up getting none of these by the time of the first game.