GT49er
Well-known member
Oh come on! He;s just a poor man's Trossard!!Would it hurt Sako to show a little bit of happiness?
Oh come on! He;s just a poor man's Trossard!!Would it hurt Sako to show a little bit of happiness?
No trip over from Berlin for you!I listened on the Albion website commentary and they said Veltman had taken a wack at Saints and suggested he might have been rested because of this.
Why? because you wanted it to? It was offside.I agree. I would prefer to see those types of technical offsides not given. I'm not sure where you draw the line (no pun intended), but that goal should stand imo.
Trossard is just a poor man’s Trossard at the momentOh come on! He;s just a poor man's Trossard!!
Sadly not. Sounded an entertaining game.No trip over from Berlin for you!
Trossard is just a poor man’s Trossard at the moment
Really enjoyed the last 30 minutes. We were all over them albeit with the game already won. Some schoolboy defensive errors but against an Arsenal side who made our lives miserable in the first hour.Absolutely cracking game. What a quality side Arsenal are, and we pushed them to the limit. Once I saw Veltman wasn't playing I new we would struggle. He would be first on my team sheet.
Onwards to Everton
Agree with this - but would refine it slightly to make it the same as Umpires call in cricket. Go with the onfield decision unless it’s so wrong that any part of the player is not onside (or offside).The rule is bullshit and its applied selectively by microscopic nazi officials hell bent on ruling out good goals and making themselves the story.
Rule should be similar as for the ball, if any part hasn't crossed line it's in.
If any part of a player is onside, they should be deemed onside.
Guarantees more goals and players being the story, not idiots in dark rooms with video monitors.
Get him in behind a proper striker (and who knows, we may have one) and you'll see the player he is.Same every year. Clocks go back and he turns to shit. I’d rip your hand off for 35m for him. I’m sure he’ll get 3 goals in April and people will be delighted.
If you watch the first one back, his left foot got clipped. He was actually fouled and would have been past two defenders so no need to dive as he was running into the box. Should have been a BHA free kick.Hardly. He was previously booked for an outrageous dive. That prevented him from making the outrageous dive you were calling for.
I know, no shit sherlock. Obviously in this case I wanted the goal to stand, but more generally I would too.Why? because you wanted it to? It was offside.