fire&skill
Killer-Diller
West Ham with 10 men and an outfield player in goal - that's a worse result than our 6-1 imho
I don't understand - why did West Ham not bring on a substitute goalkeeper? Not that they needed one, as it turned out!
West Ham with 10 men and an outfield player in goal - that's a worse result than our 6-1 imho
I don't understand - why did West Ham not bring on a substitute goalkeeper? Not that they needed one, as it turned out!
Who remembers Kevin Bremner going in goal in front of the North Stand? Was it against Gillingham?
I don't understand - why did West Ham not bring on a substitute goalkeeper? Not that they needed one, as it turned out!
Dont remember that particular game but I do remember another game against Gillingham. 2nd leg of a league cup match back in the Goldstone days. We had lost the 1st leg 1-0 away I think. Chris Hutchins then equalised for us back at The Goldstone. Gills then had their keeper sent off and had to replace him with an outield player. It turned out that they put the 2nd shortest player on the pitch in goal. Anyway, the score stayed the same and we lost on penalties!!!!!
allardyce doesn't name a sub keeper apparently, i guess its sort of playing the odds, having 5 outfield players as subs instead of 4 makes quite a big difference. From what i've heard from a west ham supporting friend, lansbury (i think?) and tomkins (i think) are actually very good goal keeperseven if they do get a keeper sent off then they could just put 9 at the back and defend a lead/damage limitation.
its interesting anyway...
The Big Sam said:Blackpool. Another victim of Big Sam's tactical supremacy. Smashed apart like an adorable fanny
The Big Sam said:Big Sam peels back the banana skins of cicumstance and feasts on the tasty, potassium-filled inards of imagination