Ashton

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
Instead of Willcott
 






Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
Blue&WhiteSea said:
Would prefer Harewood

Sod it leave Willcott and Croach and ake them both.
 




Schrödinger's Toad

Nie dla Idiotów
Jan 21, 2004
11,957
Looks a much better bet than Crouch - at least he has some amount of footballing ability. Crouch was utter GASH today; I don't buy all this "he's got a good touch for a big man" bollocks - no he hasn't, it's shit. He's shit. Not impressed.
 


sir danny cullip

New member
Feb 14, 2004
5,433
Burgess Hill
Repugnant Toad said:
Looks a much better bet than Crouch - at least he has some amount of footballing ability. Crouch was utter GASH today; I don't buy all this "he's got a good touch for a big man" bollocks - no he hasn't, it's shit. He's shit. Not impressed.

Totally agree, ashton is a much more effective player.
 


Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
ashton instead of walcott
 






Les Biehn

GAME OVER
Aug 14, 2005
20,610
Ashton and Harewood to go instead of Walcott and Crouch me thinks. Sven's a cock.
 


Munkfish

Well-known member
May 1, 2006
12,117
ashton and bent would be my preferd choice! both proved themselfs alot more than crouch and walcott this season
 




Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,812
Location Location
Ashton pisses on Crouch. Touch, control, power, passing, strength in the air, the works.

Been saying it for MONTHS.
 


perth seagull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
5,487
Les Biehn said:
Ashton and Harewood to go instead of Walcott and Crouch me thinks. Sven's a cock.

Definitely, but Sven like most England managers will only take players from the "bigger" clubs!
 


Rich Suvner

Skint years RIP
Jul 17, 2003
2,500
Worthing
drop jenas or hargreaves and add ashton to the squad. we have adequate midfield cover and ashton offers something none of the other 4 strikers do. that way we have a very nice mix up front. i dont like crouch and think he is totally overated but still recognise that his height has posed problems to our advantage in the past BUT we need another option for the full 90 - ashton is that player
 




Crouch was out of the game completely today, so he can't rip a Prem defence apart, let a one create anything. Over a 90 mins game this does not look good for England. Ashton, looked like he had time on the ball, obviously strong, could do a job with the invalids of England.
 






Gully

Monkey in a seagull suit.
Apr 24, 2004
16,812
Way out west
Either bent over Ashton or hobbling Harewood instead of Hargreaves and Crouch for me please, both have been on top form in the last couple of months, surely that must count for something.
 




Marc

New member
Jul 6, 2003
25,267
Bent should be going, if not then on the subs list ahead of that twat AJ!
As for Ashton, maybe abit too early but as he's the next Shearer (IMO) then he certainly gets in my future squad.
 


graz126

Well-known member
Oct 17, 2003
4,147
doncaster
i would prefer ashton and harewood in front of crouch and walcot. and then i would prefer crouch and bent on reserves list. i would also prefer wright phillips in front of aaron lennon.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top