[News] Air India flight AI171 Ahmedabad -> London Gatwick crashed

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,151
Back in Sussex
That aircraft looks like it has stalled. (Not enough forward airspeed).

Looking at the flight radar playback too, the runway they took off of has its last taxiway entry point about halfway down the runway, then (similar to Luton) aircraft should turn left, backtrack the runway, and turn around in a turning circle, before taking off. If flight radar trace is accurate? It looks like this aircraft turned right straight onto runway from the taxiway entry, about half way down runway and didn't backtrack. It's hard to imagine a fully loaded 787 would have enough performance with half the runway and would make sense that they were struggling for airspeed and lift.

It may well be something else, or flightradar trace not accurate. Wheels down is also not normal for a departing aircraft.

This is runway, and this aircraft took off in direction of top to bottom of photo
View attachment 204076
From a quick read on twitter, taking off from that runway entry point is entirely normal.

Reading pilots discussing it - https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls/666472-plane-crash-near-ahmedabad-2.html - they seem to be suggesting it could be human error mixing up flaps (up, not down) and the gear (down, not up).
 








vegster

Sanity Clause
May 5, 2008
28,503
Terrible news, so sad. So many lives cut short.
 


herecomesaregular

We're in the pipe, 5 by 5
Oct 27, 2008
4,883
Still in Brighton




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,608
Hurst Green
That aircraft looks like it has stalled. (Not enough forward airspeed).

Looking at the flight radar playback too, the runway they took off of has its last taxiway entry point about halfway down the runway, then (similar to Luton) aircraft should turn left, backtrack the runway, and turn around in a turning circle, before taking off. If flight radar trace is accurate? It looks like this aircraft turned right straight onto runway from the taxiway entry, about half way down runway and didn't backtrack. It's hard to imagine a fully loaded 787 would have enough performance with half the runway and would make sense that they were struggling for airspeed and lift.

It may well be something else, or flightradar trace not accurate. Wheels down is also not normal for a departing aircraft.

This is runway, and this aircraft took off in direction of top to bottom of photo
View attachment 204076
Before we all speculate I'll just correct you. An aircraft stall is due to angle of attack being exceeded not lack of speed that is another matter. The length of the runway here would require a B787 to use the full runway no way would a clear to takeoff be given by the tower. As far as the undercarrige being down it happened straight after takeoff.
 


Goldstone1976

We got Calde back, then lost him again. Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
14,573
Herts
From a quick read on twitter, taking off from that runway entry point is entirely normal.

Reading pilots discussing it - https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls/666472-plane-crash-near-ahmedabad-2.html - they seem to be suggesting it could be human error mixing up flaps (up, not down) and the gear (down, not up).
Re cause: maybe. BBC reporting the pilots issued a Mayday call. Doesn’t preclude your sources’ conjecture, of course, but you’d hope that pilots would know enough to check the obvious causes before issuing a Mayday.

Dreadful scenes.
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,419
From a quick read on twitter, taking off from that runway entry point is entirely normal.

Reading pilots discussing it - https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls/666472-plane-crash-near-ahmedabad-2.html - they seem to be suggesting it could be human error mixing up flaps (up, not down) and the gear (down, not up).
That's a strong possibility? It's hard to tell from brief video clip, if wing is clean (flap up). Take off flaps only move a little on rear of wing in take off configuration, front of wing (leading edge) is impossible to see in video

But gear is down. And if they did accidently Select flaps up (instead of gear) as suggested, before accelerating to the flaps up speed, they'd instantly put themselves in a stall. (Not enough airspeed for flaps up). And not enough lift.

Worse still is Indian cities have such high densities. Dread to think what the final death toll will be 😞
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,608
Hurst Green
From a quick read on twitter, taking off from that runway entry point is entirely normal.

Reading pilots discussing it - https://www.pprune.org/accidents-close-calls/666472-plane-crash-near-ahmedabad-2.html - they seem to be suggesting it could be human error mixing up flaps (up, not down) and the gear (down, not up).
The undercarrige lever is on the facia and looks like a small undercarrage, designed NOT to be missed. The flaps lever are in the centre consul. It would be almost unbelievable to think a pilot would make an error like that.
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,151
Back in Sussex
The undercarrige lever is on the facia and looks like a small undercarrage, designed NOT to be missed. The flaps lever are in the centre consul. It would be almost unbelievable to think a pilot would make an error like that.
Yeah - I know very little, which is why I tend to go to PPRUNE for flight things, as it's people who generally have first-hand knowledge of this stuff, so is hopefully better-informed.
 












PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,608
Hurst Green
That's a strong possibility? It's hard to tell from brief video clip, if wing is clean (flap up). Take off flaps only move a little on rear of wing in take off configuration, front of wing (leading edge) is impossible to see in video

But gear is down. And if they did accidently Select flaps up (instead of gear) as suggested, before accelerating to the flaps up speed, they'd instantly put themselves in a stall. (Not enough airspeed for flaps up). And not enough lift.

Worse still is Indian cities have such high densities. Dread to think what the final death toll will be 😞
It does look a clean wing from what I can see but can't see the slats.
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,419
Before we all speculate I'll just correct you. An aircraft stall is due to angle of attack being exceeded not lack of speed that is another matter. The length of the runway here would require a B787 to use the full runway no way would a clear to takeoff be given by the tower. As far as the undercarrige being down it happened straight after takeoff.
Mate, Correcting me? 21 years my friend!

Yes that is technically correct, but if you're at 10 degrees angle of attack, 20 or 30 why do you stall? Because you don't have the airspeed for that angle of attack. Critical angle of attack depends on configuration and airspeed. If you don't have the airspeed for the angle of attack you're not flying you're falling, you have 2 choices, push nose forward or increase airspeed (add thrust).

I don't know the runway length, but take off performance from any intersection is a function of engine performance, weight, wind and temperature. Intersection take offs are normal. This one looks about half way down which would seem unusual that a fully laden (heavy) 787 can depart about half way down (unless runway is massively long?) Tower wouldn't stop you from taking off, it's the Captains responsibility to ensure they have the performance to take off from an intersection (if that's what they do)

Gear up is first action on confirming positive rate of climb. Its not normal its down when they crash in video.
 


lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969
NSC Patron
Jun 11, 2011
14,539
Worthing
Mrs LLF has just showed me a post on Facebook.

One particular comment is vile.
James Martin, I’d rather have anyone on that plane in my country than you.

Anyway, my deepest condolences to anyone affected.
 


Randy McNob

> > > > > > Cardiff > > > > >
Jun 13, 2020
4,921
i've flown China Eastern many times, never a problem with the flight itself, but not a great airline imo
 




Official Old Man

Uckfield Seagull
Aug 27, 2011
9,761
Brighton
Just gone on flightradar and flights going over the airport are getting 17,000 viewers (it came up when I opened the app). Are they expecting another plane to be shot down or something?
Flight SVA986 heading that way had 0 viewers but now has 4128 and rising as it gets closer.
 


PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,608
Hurst Green
Mate, Correcting me? 21 years my friend!

Yes that is technically correct, but if you're at 10 degrees angle of attack, 20 or 30 why do you stall? Because you don't have the airspeed for that angle of attack. Critical angle of attack depends on configuration and airspeed. If you don't have the airspeed for the angle of attack you're not flying you're falling, you have 2 choices, push nose forward or increase airspeed (add thrust).

I don't know the runway length, but take off performance from any intersection is a function of engine performance, weight, wind and temperature. Intersection take offs are normal. This one looks about half way down which would seem unusual that a fully laden (heavy) 787 can depart about half way down (unless runway is massively long?) Tower wouldn't stop you from taking off, it's the Captains responsibility to ensure they have the performance to take off from an intersection (if that's what they do)

Gear up is first action on confirming positive rate of climb. Its not normal its down when they crash in video.
I was just using my Aeronautics Degree ;) and 20 years for BCal/BA. However the B777 was a new aircraft when I left.

The video clip of it crashing with sound didn't hear the engines screaming.

I shall await what comes out as facts, for now my thoughts are with those people involved.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top