10 More Resons why McGhee should go

[The Large One]

I agree Flo is crap... and I also want Henderson, but I am not yet convinced the latter is a better keeper than the FDM... certainly has better distribution, but tends to push the ball out to advancing strikers, e.g. at Sheff Wed away... none of this suggests MM should be sacked BTW...

Henderson worried me at first, he was quite a flapper but as he settled into the side, he appeared to get more confidence - and it showed. The same was true for Kuipers at first around five years ago.

Henderson distribution can be wayward - balls hoofed into touch or, believe or not, kicked too far and straight through to the other keeper.

If Henderson arrives, I would be happy with either Kuipers or him playing.

The idea of getting Henderson now is so that we don't miss out on him at the end of the season, something which there would be a very real prospect of happening. This is a good example of the club being pro-active.

 

[Yorkie]

Its exactly that attitube that leads to disaster.

We're doomed Mr Mainwaring

 

[Schrödinger's Toad]

Kuipers is one of the best keepers this club has had and he is a great shot stopper, yes his distribution is poor, but I would rather stop goals first.

I think Kuipers would be well down that list - when Henderson comes, he'll rightly lose his place, and he was never anywhere near in the same league as Roberts, a superior keeper in every aspect.

 

[B.W.]

Its exactly that attitube that leads to disaster.

Oh... I thought that supporting your club was a good idea... thank you for pointing out the error of my ways...

 

[Yorkie]

B;imey RT and I agree about something to do with football

 

[The Large One]

I think Kuipers would be well down that list - when Henderson comes, he'll rightly lose his place, and he was never anywhere near in the same league as Roberts, a superior keeper in every aspect.

While respecting your opinion, I fundamentally disagree on all criteria except distribution.

Thank you.

 

[shabba]

I think Kuipers would be well down that list - when Henderson comes, he'll rightly lose his place, and he was never anywhere near in the same league as Roberts, a superior keeper in every aspect.

Oh dear you really don' get to watch much football do you

 

[B.W.]

I suspect your vocation in life it to follow not lead, good luck

Thank you again... this time for the career advice... I better change jobs then, since I have been in a leadership position for about 10 years...

 

[Easy 10]

Shabba, you'd rather put an OAP or Charlie Oatway in charge of the team. Of course you're entitled to voice an opinion, but you are quite clearly madder than a bucket of frogs.

 

[shabba]

Oh... I thought that supporting your club was a good idea... thank you for pointing out the error of my ways...

My pleasure and good luck the next time a bill archer takes over and you support him

 

[shabba]

Thank you again... this time for the career advice... I better change jobs then, since I have been in a leadership position for about 10 years...

Oh dear
let me know which company so I can avoid buying shares in them!

 

[shabba]

Shabba, you'd rather put an OAP or Charlie Oatway in charge of the team. Of course you're entitled to voice an opinion, but you are quite clearly madder than a bucket of frogs.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. They said the guy a watford was to young and look what happened

 

[B.W.]

Henderson worried me at first, he was quite a flapper but as he settled into the side, he appeared to get more confidence - and it showed. The same was true for Kuipers at first around five years ago.

Henderson distribution can be wayward - balls hoofed into touch or, believe or not, kicked too far and straight through to the other keeper.

If Henderson arrives, I would be happy with either Kuipers or him playing.

The idea of getting Henderson now is so that we don't miss out on him at the end of the season, something which there would be a very real prospect of happening. This is a good example of the club being pro-active.

I agree with most of that... it would be a first if this was a proactive move... why do you think this is such a good example of being proactive?... we haven't even signed him yet... maybe the agreement on price should have been thrashed out while he was on loan?...

 

[The Large One]

So this is your idea of leadership, shabba? March us straight into oblivion? Thank f*** you don't run the club.

Ooh. Or maybe you do.

 

[B.W.]

I think Kuipers would be well down that list - when Henderson comes, he'll rightly lose his place, and he was never anywhere near in the same league as Roberts, a superior keeper in every aspect.

Every aspect... especially his Coco the Clown impressions...

 

[Easy 10]

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. They said the guy a watford was to young and look what happened

He cooked a suet ?

 

[The Large One]

I agree with most of that... it would be a first if this was a proactive move... why do you think this is such a good example of being proactive?... we haven't even signed him yet... maybe the agreement on price should have been thrashed out while he was on loan?...

We are being pro-active in TRYING to sign him. Maybe a deal could have been thrashed out, but McGhee was prioritising trying to get Blayney, someone he genuinely thought he could get. And look how much Redknapp yanked his chain.

 

[The Large One]

He cooked a suet ?

And now he's got football pie... all down his shirt.

The Day Today, 1994

 

[Schrödinger's Toad]

Blimey RT and I agree about something to do with football

I know ... worrying, isn't it?

 

[B.W.]

My pleasure and good luck the next time a bill archer takes over and you support him

Don't accuse me of that... comparing the Archer era to the current situation shows what a complete idiot you are (but we knew that anyway)...