Search results

??? how am i defending Johnson, saying i want more useful information, less waffle. what he said was on record already submitted, it's indefensible, move to the next section. if i wasnt clear, the Inquiry process seems to be largely about getting people involved to offer their opinions and...

well it is largely about opinons. all the information, documents, minutes, decisions are submitted to the inquiry. the testimony is much pseudo cross examination, "what did you mean by..." or worse "what did you think she meant...". it dissolves to heresay. there's not a lot of examination of...

AstraZeneca vaccine reported few % lower efficacy and was far, far easier to manufacture at the time. Pfizer stuggled to get the new production lines up, understandble for a new tech. the worst vaccines are ones you never heard of becuase their efficcay was significantly lower and we didnt...

because they are more honest? and because Johnson doesnt know any better.

i thought latest claim was he deliberatly factory reset the phone to clear the messages. they'll be deleted and keys wiped/renewed in that process, making messages irretrievable. not going to be anything of substance or that we dont already know on the phone, it's fishing for some headliners...

other poster is refering to vaccine. they were not happy about delays in having that, especially as it was a German biotech that came up with the mRNA vaccine aka Pfizer.

on the contrary, from what i've watched and read it's delving into excruciating detail, who said what, when, why, what did they know, did others agree, why not... this morning there was a distraction about bad language used by some officials. they dont need to ask many questions, the evidence...

watching, there's a good deal of aftertiming. questions are framed with knowledge we have now, as if they were known at the time in Jan and Feb, when it was much more vague and speculative at that time.

a group were stood at the back, holding paper showing some message (poss the "dead cant hear").

one might think so, but which organisation? see below. we know there is a pandemic plan, cited in many papers, reviews, court cases, revolves around flu and this was not flu so didn't work (clear the hospitals to make space... oh bugger). one could say there was no flexible plan for response...