Search results

All well put. Barnes may divide your fans as he can have a propensity to miss a sitter or two, but he works his NUTS off and has a massive determination to win, which can help drag a team through a poor performance. He's still improving too.

Ings is off, and Barnes and Vokes aren't that far apart in quality.

Fair point - my favourite was the game where he scored 2 recently and still got dogs' abuse.

Imagine the ABUSE Barnes would get from his BOO BOYS if his deal fell through and he came back, tail between his legs, and then missed 7 (SEVEN) sitters in his first game back for us.

True, true. He strikes me as a bit of a one club man, but at the same time he strikes me as being very ambitious, and would definitely believe he can force his way into Burnley's first 11.

He's completed a medical. This is no bluff to force our hand into a better deal.

Quite - everyone complains that he hasn't signed the contract but maybe we've offered him a laughable amount, as we did to Murray? For all we know, Barnes might've only been holding out for an extra £500 a week...

Welbeck's pretty slim? PETERRRR CROUUUUCCCHHH

I don't think transfer values are ONLY based on weight.

I had hoped the club might've learned from the Murray debacle. Perhaps not.

3-4 years is a bit long. Barnes is proving himself a better goalscorer and is much younger, improving all the time. Would be an illogical move unless it was Doyle + a lot of money.

No thanks. 30 years old, on the way down, with a much poorer goalscoring record than Barnes over the past 3 years.

How is it "perfect" to replace a very good striker with one with a very poor strike rate?!

Piss OFF.