Search results

What does accused mean though? I could accuse you of theft, not that I will, but you must be able to see my point? Publishing these ambiguous stats is dangerous in my opinion. I am going out for a beer and some food now but will look for some more meaningful figures later or tomorrow. Have a...

I was not swerving you, more gave up on you for rambling on about arrest rates when I wanted to see some conviction rates. You're not a criminal until you are convicted. Unless I am mistaken these were not provided so I moved on.

Dont be silly. It's not that difficult especially when I provide you with the context. No one else seems to struggle.

You are looking quite desperate in trying to make your misunderstanding hold. If someone posts something, and I reply AND go to the bother of quoting the post do you a) think my post is a DIRECT reply to that post or b) me rambling on about something different? Have a think about it.

I felt personally insulted as it refered to my post. Now, if Mick comes back and says he is offended then I will address it but I see no need to address you being offended on his behalf.

Yes they did ask you. UKIP offered an opportunity to close the borders at the last election and the Tories will offer an in/out referendum at the next election and I presume UKIP will again. If the nation wants this they have two options to achieve it.

Here you go: Maybe I should have added "for jobs" at the end to make it totally utterly clear but I think in the context it is clear enough.

Go and re-read post #18. My reply which you quote above is a clear response to a post about competition for jobs.

I was talking in the context of competition for jobs. And, as a customer of either a railway or any other business, generally I'd want a the positions filled by the best people to deliver the end product.

Insulting my original post, which he clearly had neither read or maybe not understood, by calling it typical left wing bull shit will provoke a reaction will it not?

Says Thick Mick from Patcham.

But it wasn't a Guardian study was it you fool? Typical bullshit from a dunce NSC poster.

Arrest rates mean jack-all though. What are the conviction rates for Romanians? And what are these in comparison to other races in the same geographical location?

Okay. That's the arrest rate, but the stat of value is the conviction rate; arrest rate is pretty meaningless in this context. In fact the first thing that jumps out to me from these figures is that the police might be unfairly targeting a new racial group which we know they do with other racial...

Given there won't be any UK retail left by the time they come flooding in this should not be an issue.

FFS. If you join a thread please have the decency to at least get the gist of the opening post even if you dont want to read it all. It saves us wasting time and prevents you looking dumb.

It was reported in The Guardian but not commissioned by them.

As a consumer I want competition and choice.

That's 10. What about the others?

Immigrants to EU countries less likely to live on benefits Have a great Easter everyone.