Search results

It's much less exciting than that. I read there was a 20% sell on clause due to Independiente which means we get 85 mill. Amortise that over the contract length and Chelsea's FFP exposure is around 10 mill a year. There's no big money button that The Todd has to pay now AFAIK. I assume we won't...

Thought he played for Liverpool in the 80s

What it’s NOT about is party politics and the pandemic. Frankly, we’ve done those to death.

Stays our player then. Chelsea had three months’ worth of chances. I’m sure when he realises it’s Liverpool or us he’ll suddenly grow a brain.

We should turn it down for the player’s sake. Liverpool is a far better move for him than basket case Chelsea. Looks like he’s got a very, very greedy and clueless agent.

This. We need to sign and fund a replacement tout de suite. We can’t have Chelsea stretching the process out for days just because a Z List porn star and a few dweebs in Lagos are upset.

Reliable source Jason Steele said he was training.

….the flappy flanged table breaker

Yep, until the great coach needed bailing out of a seven game goalless streak

Most importantly, what will become of ROLAND’S videos?

Getting that amount of money AND stiffing Chelsea is brilliant, but it’s only half the job. We’ve lost our two most important players this summer and we need to crack on with finding a De Zerbi approved replacement. Every other club is now going to know we’ve got money to burn and we know the...

:lolol: :lolol: :lolol: