Search results

It would be unsurprising if there are two announcements. When Murray went - didn't we get CMS the same day (it was soemthing like that).

Fair enough - it is open to debate anyway.

It's human nature. Look at Arsenal. Fantastic stadium, fantastic array of young talent over the years, Champions League every year but people are not happy because they have not won a Carling Cup for a few years. People who moan will feel completely justified - but if you had a season ticket...

These are indeed the greatest of days for our Club. We are very fortunate to be here at this time.

Fair enough. I have spent more time than usual on here today and I have not seen hardly any of those types of postings. Maybe you need to re-calibrate your tolerance levels.

I hope you are not including me in that.

Well that is a rule I do agree with. If there was not a problem with the practice I am not sure why they put a limit on it. Anyway - I am boring myself on this one now. Welcome Wayne. I am sure we will help you rediscover your love of the game.

I am looking forward to seeing Bridge playing for us. I am not making it such an issue - I do not think the rules are right, and it makes me feel uncomfortable. I wish we had our own player, or a player whose wages we could afford. But pushing it to its logical extreme - would you be happy with...

The Clubs who don't go up because their promotion place is taken by the club playing the players thay can't afford to pay out of their own funds.

Has anyone seen Bobkin and Barnes in the same room ?

Good point. I will draw up a schedule. I have no idea about Reyes - if we were not paying all his wages, well I think we should have. It felt wrong with Bellamy at Cardiff, and to me, it feels wrong here. Of course it is within the rules.

If true - apparently he will need all our German doctor's magic.

Well - if Bridge scores the 30-yard screamer in the last minute of the play-off final against Palace that takes us up - I expect a lot of other supporters will be commenting on the fact that we should not be able to play players we could not afford. We, however, will be dancing in the street.

I was never 100% convinced by Mattock. Good player mind, and I would have been happy to keep him, but I would have hoped we would find better.

Quite.

There is an argument that for the football we play - full back is THE most important position. And there are players around - like the Burnley lad. I wouldn't. And the rules are wrong, and make me feel uncomfortable. You can make your own mind up whether it is moral or not.

Was he ? Fair enough. Perhaps I am talking bollocks. It would not be the first time.

Surprisingly the Club did not let me know what the finances were on the other loans. This one we know about. Look - I can see he has been a good player, and could be for us. Just paying a fraction of his salary makes me uncomfortable. Did you see the left back that Burnley had last year ? He...

I am sure that was Mancini's view as well.

That all sounds plausible. Hopefully Gus can fire him up.