Search results

Oh dear. I’m devastated.

Maybe the F word is deemed slightly less offensive than the C word. but I can remember rugby at school nearly 60 years ago (hated it) - any arguing with the referee and you’re sent off. maybe football should do the same. And it is the inconsistency that jars!

Not everyone necessarily wants every single decision to go to their team. I’ve sat in WSU on occasion feeling sure that an Albion goal was offside when it was allowed, or suspecting that one of our own had dived. but then there are times when you see it live and are outraged, but when you see...

Other people have said no one has been sent off for dissent for 11 years, BUT that’s not what happened here. He had a yellow card for dissent. he then had a straight red for foul and abusive language. The Argus has said that the Press Association have confirmed the straight red. Calling the ref...

Just read on the Argus website that the Press Association confirmed it was a straight red for foul and abusive language.

There’s a difference between dissent and “foul and abusive language” if he just carried on saying “but ref, you’re still wrong”, that would be second yellow card, then red for two yellow card offences. If he said, “cheating c##t,” “ bald prick” or any of the other things I have read that...