Search results

Honestly, I reckon it was on for about 30 seconds before I scoffed at something that was said. Horrendous.

Yeah, it's another post about your comment, because you accused someone of dragging something out, when you referred to a comment from three days previously! I was merely pointing out the hypocisy. I don't care what you're 'interested in debating', I can post whatever I like, whenever I like...

I don't see what the problem is – technology evolves all the time and I know for a fact that the AA now has a healthy fleet of vans to help people who run out of charge at the roadside, alongside the ones that help people sort their ICE cars out when they misfuel. Having spoken to Edmund King...

To be fair, mine was the post you quoted about it being stonking (a term that I didn't think about that much at all, but you appear to have focussed in on) yesterday morning. I made that comment on SUNDAY... It was a decent penalty, which couldn't have been placed much better. Could MOR do that...

No 'season-defining'? Must try harder :lolol:

I love it – and so does Leo!

Yule not be disappointed with that post.

'It's got last-minute consolation written all over it'?

Well I've 'got a feeling' it'll be so NEXT season, too ???

No, it didn't – not how you iniitally decribed. Look from eight minutes in on here. Gomez, Minteh and Mitoma are all moving towards him the minute the ball hits the back of the net – well before he had to 'beckon teammates over'.

This next game could be pre-season-defining. These are a good side.

Yeah, I thought exactly the same!

I've been a journalist for over 25 years and one thing I learned very early on is that there are NO idiotic questions. Because often the simplest – or what are deemed the most obvious – questions get the biggest/most rattled (therefore making a great story) response. YOUR response (ironic from...

He's not Finnish. He's only 33!

Hilarious the way he is laying into them and responding to questions about the past four months like he had fack all to do with it. Snowflakes.

LOLz. The fact that I took it at face value suggests that many people would believe it was a personal SHUNNING of the gaffer!

This. VINCENTE FTW! :albion2:

Isn't it just that the two (Ebbsfleet and Brands) are really near each other?

So, was he sacked, or what? It's like RDZ* all over again :lolol: *Was HE sacked?

Or, alternatively, he didn't want to lump Fab into the first group, but put something separate about the current manager. If he wanted to make a negative point about FH, I dount he would have described the experience as a 'pleasure'. He just would've written something more bland. Pretty obvious...