Apologies, I must have misread your post, I thought you meant the medical negligence claim was between the club and Milner, which was preventing him playing!
Apparently the two-child cap removal is only for white families* - can't have all those foriners breeding, and getting paid for it, can we!!!
*said in poor taste jest, obviously...
Not according to this, he has nothing but praise for the medical team at BHA...
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6382069/2025/05/27/milner-injury-brighton/
Individual cases can always be emotive, but as a rule of thumb we don't generally send people back to countries where they might be killed, whatever crimes they have committed in this country! Something about common decency. I guess it's similar reasons as to why we did away with the death...
So, for the odd few cases like this, where someone appears to benefit "unfairly", you want to take everyone's human rights away by leaving the ECHR?
Is that what you are suggesting?
More half truths from Nige, relying on thick people not to "do their own research"...!
Australia still has refugee/asylum seekers land on their shores and some are granted leave to stay. So no zero costs!
As for their tow back policy. Most of the arrivals to Australia come on fully crewed...
The current reporting and my comparison with Jean Charles goes back further and has comparisons even to Hillsborough, where the media definitely did a job on leaked (false) info from above...
Nope. The other way round. Members of the public incorrectly identified JCdM jumping the barriers and were interviewed on rolling News channels saying such.
The Met, to their shame were quite happy to let the lie run and then perpetuated it, all the time knowing it was SO15 officers who leapt...
Not sure I follow what you are saying!
I was working for The Met at the time of that incident and we had a big screen TV (appropriated from a burglar) on in the office.
I clearly recall seeing people interviewed on rolling TV news channels, saying they had seen JCdM jump the tube barriers -...
Since Jean Charles de Menezes case I always take immediate “eye-witness” statements, particularly of those keen to talk to the media, with an EXTREMELY large pinch of salt.
Clearly, time will tell, but really it’s just more speculation to add to the story and the way of social media and news...
I thought he claimed Russia invading Ukraine would never have happened if he was President at the time, as he and Putin have a good relationship.
It's almost like he talks complete and utter bollocks, isn't it?