Search results

Usually I'd agree, but he was decent last night, said we played the better football etc. Did you listen to the commentary?

Thought his commentary on 5 Live was very good and balanced last night. I'll forgive him referring to Palace as "we" all the time, and finishing with "and a Palace win hopefully" as I'd want an Albion legend to do the same.

Agreed. Last line should be something like "so let The Cyclone blow forever more"

What are the words again? Heard it against Wolves but couldn't make them all out.

Downloaded security essentials and uninstalled Norton without any problems. Thanks for the tips all.

Cool, thanks all. I try not to be too dodgy these days.

Looking to ditch my Norton 360 subscription for my home use (the usual; a couple of messageboards, online shopping, banking, surfing porn). First question; is this a good move? If so, second question; what free antivirus software would you recommend?

Hear hear. Take note Mr.Barber.

In hindsight you can use these sort of arguments for any long term gain following an 'evil' act. We could have equally gone out of existence had Robbie not scored at Hereford, Hitler could have won WWII had he not fallen for the great inflatable D-Day con etc etc.

Met and chatted to a few Wolves fans before the game, seemed a sound bunch who all genuinely hoped we'd go up. Shocking display by most of their players, they need a squad of Stephen Hunts (no, that's not rhyming slang)

The Last Word: Orwellian curb on fans Comment - Football - The Independent You are a law-abiding football supporter. You pay your taxes and adhere to your responsibilities as a good citizen. Your basic rights are challenged without recourse and you are treated with contempt, as a threat to...

Sky Sports News bloke just said "well, it was entertaining". Either he's a comic genius or needs to get out a LOT more.

It's a rare gift when done with panache.

Great ANALogy

One for the stattos; how many of Ulloa's goals have come from Orlandi assists?

Toughest NSC poll ever? I honestly couldn't put a ciggy paper between PIG, Bridge, Spanish Dave, Orlandi and Ulloa, with Upson, Hammond and Bruno very close behind in that order.

I have a feeling it's Huddersfied for the drop.

To avoid this turning into a debate on semantics I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on that point.

I'm not sure you can reliably quote wikipedia entries as scientific fact, and knowhere does that article illustrate proportionality.

Very well put, and yes, that is my point. I understand where the prejudice comes from, but feel like it is discouraged from being debated due to concerns that the argument in itself is racist or un-PC, when in fact it is not.